For any integers $m$ and $n$, if $7m+5n=147$, then $m$ is odd or $n$ is odd.

$$Q(m,n) \equiv 7m+5n=147$$

$$∀m∀n: Q(m,n) → \bigl(m \not\equiv 0 \!\!\pmod 2 \lor n \not\equiv 0 \!\! \pmod 2\bigr)$$

Am I right in assuming $\forall$ means "any" in this case? It doesn't seem to make sense to me ($\exists$ to me means "at least one, many, one, all but one, etc; anything less than all but more than none"), but Wikipedia states that $\forall$ can also mean "for any".

Is this correct?

up vote 10 down vote accepted

Yes, "for any" means "for all" means $\forall$. "Any" implies you pick an arbitrary integer, so it must be true for all of them.

As for mods: usually, it's not expressed as an operator, but instead as a kind of equivalence relation: $a \equiv b \pmod{n}$ means that $n$ divides $a - b$. So you would write "m is odd" as $m \equiv 1 \pmod 2$.

  • In fact there is a binary mod operation: $x\bmod y$ is defined to be $x-y\lfloor x/y\rfloor$ for $y\ne 0$. The $\LaTeX$ code for it is \bmod. It is perfectly correct to write $m\bmod 2=1$ for ‘$m$ is odd’. – Brian M. Scott Oct 9 '13 at 6:26
  • For the sake of simplicity, do mathematics persons generally recognize % as the modulo operator? It doesn't take much to change my m%2=1 to m=1 (mod 2), but I'd rather remain consistent. – gator Oct 9 '13 at 6:33
  • 1
    @BrianM.Scott That is true, but I think it's correct to say the usual expression is a relation? And @ riista, no, I'd bet most would know what you're talking about, but it's not considered correct, as far as I know. – Henry Swanson Oct 9 '13 at 6:36
  • 1
    @riista: In my view the only thing that makes it look odd to a mathematician is the use of % instead of $\bmod$. – Brian M. Scott Oct 9 '13 at 6:41
  • 2
    "any" can also mean "there exists"; it depends on the particular sentence. – Carl Mummert Oct 9 '13 at 10:49

$\forall m$ is usually read for all m or for each m; for any m is a possible paraphrase in some contexts. $\forall x\big(\varphi(x)\big)$ means that for all possible values of $x$ in the domain of discourse, the statement $\varphi(x)$ about $x$ is true. If you think of $\varphi(x)$ as saying that $x$ has some particular property, then $\forall x\big(\varphi(x)\big)$ says that every element in the domain of discourse has that property.

Your understanding of $\exists$ isn’t quite correct, however; $\exists m\big(\varphi(m)\big)$ means precisely that there is at least one thing in the domain of discourse that has the property in question. It does not exclude the possibility that every element of the domain of discourse has it. For example, if we’re talking about integers, $\exists n(n\text{is even }\lor n\text{ is odd}\}$ is a true statement, even though $\forall n(n\text{is even }\lor n\text{ is odd}\}$ is also true.

If a statement is true "for all", it implies that it is true for a subset or in this case for any one element.

Your Answer


By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.