7
$\begingroup$

I am given this equation: $f^{-1}(B_1 \cap B_2) = f^{-1}(B_1) \cap f^{-1}(B_2)$

I want to prove it: what i did is

I take any $a \in f^{-1}(B_1 \cap B_2)$, then there is $b \in (B_1 \cap B_2)$ so that $f(a)=b$. Because of $b \in (B_1 \cap B_2)$, it is true that $b \in B_1$ and $b \in B_2$, so $a \in f^{-1}(B_1)$ and $a \in f^{-1}(B_2)$.

this means $f^{-1}(B_1 \cap B_2) \subseteq f^{-1}(B_1) \cap f^{-1}(B_2)$.

is it ok?

$\endgroup$
6
$\begingroup$

Yeah...this can be actually written in this way;

$a\in f^{-1}(B_1\cap B_2)$, means $f(a)\in B_1\cap B_2$ and so $f(a)\in B_1$ and $f(a)\in B_2$. Hence, $a\in f^{-1}(B_1)$ and $a\in f^{-1}(B_2)$

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Here is essentially the first answer, written out a bit more formally.

Let's start with the basic property of $\;f^{-1}[\cdot]\;$: $$ a \in f^{-1}[B] \;\equiv\; f(a) \in B $$ for any $\;a,B\;$. Using this, we can simply calculate \begin{align} & a \in f^{-1}[B_1 \cap B_2] \\ \equiv & \;\;\;\;\;\text{"the above basic property"} \\ & f(a) \in B_1 \cap B_2 \\ \equiv & \;\;\;\;\;\text{"definition of $\;\cap\;$"} \\ & f(a) \in B_1 \;\land\; f(a) \in B_2 \\ \equiv & \;\;\;\;\;\text{"the above basic property, twice"} \\ & a \in f^{-1}[B_1] \;\land\; a \in f^{-1}[B_2] \\ \equiv & \;\;\;\;\;\text{"reintroduce $\;\cap\;$ using its definition"} \\ & a \in f^{-1}[B_1] \cap f^{-1}[B_2] \\ \end{align} By set extensionality, the statement in question follows.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.