1
$\begingroup$

How do I write a proof for a limit where $x$ tends to negative infinity, that is $$\lim_{x\to-\infty} f(x) = L$$ using the epsilon-delta definition of limits?

Simply putting $-\infty$ in the definition does not seem to make sense: "$0<|x-(-\infty)|<\delta$"...

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You're going to have to explain what you're talking about a little more clearly. The limit of what as what tends to what? $\endgroup$
    – dfeuer
    Oct 2, 2013 at 6:17

3 Answers 3

3
$\begingroup$

The limit of a function $f$ at $-\infty$ is $\ell$ if and only if $$ \forall\varepsilon\gt0,\ \exists x,\ \forall t,\ t\lt x\implies|f(t)-\ell|\lt\varepsilon. $$ This can artificially be rewritten in the epsilon-delta frame as $$ \forall\varepsilon\gt0,\ \exists \delta\gt0,\ \forall t,\ t\lt-1/\delta\implies|f(t)-\ell|\lt\varepsilon. $$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ What is the t doing here? $\endgroup$
    – AsherM
    Oct 2, 2013 at 6:33
  • $\begingroup$ Tell me. $ $ $ $ $\endgroup$
    – Did
    Oct 2, 2013 at 6:34
1
$\begingroup$

The challenge here is that while the extended real line, $\Bbb R\cup\{-\infty,\infty\}$ with the order topology is metrizable (it's homeomorphic to a closed interval), it doesn't have any metric compatible with the usual one. Thus the metric space interpretation of "$\epsilon$-$\delta$" doesn't really work too well in this context. Furthermore, the extended real line is not a group under real addition, so it's pretty hard to imagine any more literal sort of $\epsilon$-$\delta$ variant working. So really, you have two good options:

  1. Use special definitions of limits approaching $\pm\infty$ that look different from others, or

  2. Work a bit more explicitly with the order topology, noting that not only open intervals but also open rays must be considered.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

There are other equivalent definitions, but my preference is as follows:

\begin{align*} \lim_{x \to - \infty} f(x) & = L \end{align*} if and only if \begin{align*} (\forall \epsilon > 0) & (\exists N \in \mathbb{N}) & (x > N \Rightarrow |f( - x) - L| < \epsilon) \end{align*}

That is, for any $\epsilon > 0$, I can choose $N$ such that if $x$ is greater than $N$, then $f(- x)$ is within $\epsilon$ of $L$.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .