I'm not really up to date on the current status of $\zeta (3)$ but I was messing around the other day with Fourier series and found that $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n}{(2n-1)^3} = \frac{\pi^3}{32}.$$ Is this of interest to anyone?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ There is a sign error, it should be $(-1)^{n-1}$ in the numerator. $\endgroup$ – anon Sep 30 '13 at 20:40

You've discovered $L(3,\chi)$, where $L(s,\chi)$ is the Dirichlet $L$-function and $\chi$ is the unique nontrivial character mod $4$. The Riemann zeta function and this $L$-function are related by the factorization of the Dedekind zeta function of the Gaussian quadratic field ${\Bbb Q}(i)$,

$$L_{{\Bbb Q}(i)/{\Bbb Q}}(s)=\sum_{I\triangleleft{\Bbb Z}[i]}\frac{1}{N(I)^s}=\prod_{\frak p}(1-N{\frak p}^{-s})^{-1}=\prod_p(1-p^{-s})^{-1}(1-\chi(p)p^{-s})^{-1}=\zeta(s)L(s,\chi).$$

Unfortunately knowing $L(3,\chi)$ does not tell us anything about $\zeta(3)$ in terms of closed-forms. It is expected that $\zeta(3)$ shares no relations with other $\zeta(2n+1)$s or $\pi$, not just for lack of theoretical reasons but for solid theoretical reasons to the contrary (geometry of period integrals and mixed Tate motives, see Matt E's answer here); there is good reason to expect no surprising algebraic relations between Apery's constant or other odd zeta values and $\pi$.

  • $\begingroup$ Isn't the Dirichlet L-function for character modulo 4 noted as $L(s,\chi_4)$? $\endgroup$ – Klangen Jul 24 '17 at 8:56

This is a (rather standard) Dirichlet beta function $\beta(3)$ using the definition : $$\tag{1}\beta(s):=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)^s}$$ For odd positive parameters $\,s=2k+1\;$ may be written using the Euler numbers as : $$\tag{2}\beta(2k+1)=\frac{(-1)^k\,E_{2k}\;\pi^{2k+1}}{4^{k+1}\,(2k)!)}$$ while for $n<0$ $$\tag{3}\beta(n)=\frac{E_{-n}}2$$ The Euler numbers $E_{2k}$ could be defined by the expansion : $$\tag{4}\frac 1{\cosh(t)}=\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac {E_{2k}}{(2k)!}t^{2k}=1-\frac 1{2!} t^2+\frac5{4!}t^4-\frac{61}{6!}t^6+\frac{277}{8!}t^8-\cdots$$ A parallel may be made with the expansion giving the Bernoulli numbers : $$\tag{5}\frac t{e^t-1}=\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac {B_n}{n!}t^n=1-\frac 12 \frac t{1!}+ \frac 16\frac{t^2}{2!}-\frac 1{30}\frac {t^4}{4!}+\frac 1{42}\frac{t^6}{6!}-\frac 1{30}\frac{t^8}{8!}+\cdots$$

the lambda function (or directly zeta) being (for $\Re(s)>1$) : $$\tag{6}\lambda(s):=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac 1{(2n+1)^s}=\left(1-2^{-s}\right)\,\zeta(s)$$

and the classical formula : $$\zeta(2k)=\frac{(2\pi)^{2k}}{2\,(2k)!}|B_{2k}|$$

In summary $\beta(m)$ will return simple values proportional to $\pi^m$ for odd values of $m$ while $\lambda(m)$ and $\zeta(m)$ will do that for even values of $m$. More 'complicated' values will be obtained for $m$ even for $\beta$ (Catalan constant and so on) in the first case and $m$ odd for $\lambda$ and $\zeta$.

From the point of view of Fourier expansions $(23.1.16)$ should show you clearly the relations between simple Fourier series and the Bernoulli and Euler polynomials. A parallel between their properties is given in Abramowitz and Stegun with other interesting facts.

Using complex integration (like here) let's rewrite $(4)$ and obtain formula $(2)$ : $$\tag{7}\frac 1{\cosh(t)}=\int_0^\infty \frac {\cos(t\,x)}{\cosh(\pi\,x/2)}\;dx$$ so that $$\tag{8}E_{2k}=\left.\left(\frac d{dt}\right)^{2k}\right|_{t=0}\frac 1{\cosh(t)}=(-1)^k\int_0^\infty \frac {x^{2k}}{\cosh(\pi\,x/2)}\;dx$$ Let's use this integral to derive $(2)$ : \begin{align} \int_0^\infty \frac{t^m}{2\,\cosh(t)}dt&=\int_0^\infty \frac{t^m\;e^{-t}}{1+e^{-2t}}dt\\ &=\int_0^\infty \sum_{k=0}^\infty (-1)^k\;t^m\;e^{-(2k+1)t}\;dt\\ &=\sum_{k=0}^\infty\frac {(-1)^k}{(2k+1)^m}\int_0^\infty u^m\;e^{-u}\frac{du}{2k+1}\;\\ &=\Gamma(m+1)\sum_{k=0}^\infty\frac {(-1)^k}{(2k+1)^{m+1}}\\ &=\Gamma(m+1)\,\beta(m+1)\\ \end{align} which allows to rewrite $(6)$ as (setting $m:=2k,\;t:=\pi\,x/2$) : $$\tag{9}E_{2k}= 2\left(\frac 2{\pi}\right)^{2k+1}(-1)^k\;(2k)! \,\beta(2k+1)$$ and proving $(2)$.

  • $\begingroup$ Excellent answer. I was looking for this in a different context, and it answered perfectly my question. $\endgroup$ – Klangen Jul 24 '17 at 8:55
  • $\begingroup$ Glad you liked it @Pickle! Concerning your question to anon let's observe that your Dirichlet character was noted $\chi_1$ in wikipedia (and $\chi_2$ in 2013 btw) to distinguish the different characters modulo $4$. The subject itself is fascinating ($\zeta$ and $\beta$ but not only) and you could for example go from the Bernoulli numbers to the Bernoulli polynomials to find their 'counterpart' : the Clausen function. Excellent explorations, $\endgroup$ – Raymond Manzoni Jul 24 '17 at 22:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.