does any non-empty finite subset of a set have a minimal element?

Let $(A,\sqsubseteq)$ be a partially ordered set and $\emptyset\neq B\subset A$ a finite subset. Does $B$ have a minimal element (with repect to to $\sqsubseteq$)?

I want to prove this by induction, but I get stuck at the induction hypotheses. Is this the easiest ways to prove this, or is there another way?

Suppose the proposition holds for $n \geq 1$ elements.
Given a finite subset of $n+1$ elements, first order any $n$ of them to find a minimal element, i.e., apply the Induction Hypothesis to $n$ of them. Then compare the element you've found to the last element in the subset of $n+1$ elements; this will give you a minimal element, though you may wish to write out a few more details in this regard.
• You do not necessarily have a smallest element (that is, an element smaller than all the others), all you can claim is that there are minimal elements (that is, with no elements strictly smaller). To fix the argument: Given $n+1$ elements, pick $n$. By induction, that set has a minimal element (not necessarily a smallest). Now consider the set consisting of that minimal element $a$, and the remaining ($n+1$-st) element. If either is smaller than the other, it is then minimal for the whole set of $n+1$ elements. If neither is smaller than the other, then $a$ is minimal. – Andrés E. Caicedo Sep 28 '13 at 17:30