Proof of Euler's Theorem without abstract algebra? Every proof I've seen of Euler's Theorem (that $\gcd(a,m) = 1 \implies a^{\phi(m)} \equiv 1 \pmod m$) involves the fact that the units of $\mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb{Z}$ form a group of order $\phi(m)$.  While this is a perfectly good proof, I have to wonder if it was the one that Euler used.  I know that there are fairly old precursors to group theory, but it still seems incongruous.
Thus, my question is: Are there proofs of Euler's Theorem that do not use group/ring theory?  In particular, what proof (if any; I don't know whether Euler actually discovered the theorem) did Euler use himself?
 A: Consider the set of all numbers less than $n$ and relatively prime to it. Let $\{a_1,a_2,...,a_{\varphi(n)}\}$ be this set.
Consider a number $c < n$ and relatively prime to it i.e. $c \in \{a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_{\varphi(n)}\}$.
First observe that for any $a_i$, $c a_{i} \equiv a_{j} \pmod{n}$ for some $j$.
(True since $c$ and $a_i$ are themselves relatively prime to $n$, their product has to be relatively prime to $n$. This follows immediately from the definition).
If $c a_{i} \equiv c a_{j} \pmod{n}$ then $a_i = a_j$.
(True as cancellation can be done since $c$ is relatively prime to $n$).
Hence, if we now consider the set $\{ca_1,ca_2,...,ca_{\varphi(n)}\}$ this is just a permutation of the set $\{a_1,a_2,...,a_{\varphi(n)}\}$.
Thereby, we have $\displaystyle \prod_{k=1}^{\varphi(n)} ca_k \equiv \prod_{k=1}^{\varphi(n)} a_k \pmod{n}$.
Hence, we get $\displaystyle c^{\varphi(n)} \prod_{k=1}^{\varphi(n)} a_k \equiv \prod_{k=1}^{\varphi(n)} a_k \pmod{n}$.
Now, note that $\displaystyle \prod_{k=1}^{\varphi(n)} a_k$ is relatively prime to $n$ and hence you can cancel them on both sides to get
$$c^{\varphi(n)} \equiv 1 \pmod{n}$$ whenever $(c,n) = 1$.
