4
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a variety (integral scheme of finite type) over $\overline{\mathbb Q}$. We may endow the sets $X(\overline{\mathbb Q})$ and $X(\mathbb C)$ of $\overline{\mathbb Q}$- resp. $\mathbb C$-valued points of $X$ with the topologies induced by the topology on $\overline{\mathbb Q} \subset \mathbb C$. We have $X(\overline{\mathbb Q}) \subset X(\mathbb C)$.

Q: Is $X(\overline{\mathbb Q})$ dense in $X(\mathbb C)$?

For a smooth $X$ I can show this. For $\dim X = 0$ this is also true.

Ansatz: The question is local on $X$, so we can assume that $X = \operatorname{Spec} A$, $A = \overline{\mathbb Q}[X_1, \ldots, X_n]/(f_1, \ldots, f_r)$ for polynomials $f_i$ in variables $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ over $\overline{\mathbb Q}$. So the question is, whether $$ \{ (x_1, \ldots, x_n) \in \overline{\mathbb Q}^n~|~f_i(x_1, \ldots, x_n) = 0~\text{for all}~i \} $$ is dense in $$ \{ (x_1, \ldots, x_n) \in \mathbb C^n~|~f_i(x_1, \ldots, x_n) = 0~\text{for all}~i \}. $$

$\endgroup$
10
  • $\begingroup$ I take it that by that bar over the Q you mean to denote the algebraic numbers. So, you are not actually asking about rational-valued points, but algebraic-valued points. If I have that right, maybe you would want to edit the title of the question. $\endgroup$ Sep 25, 2013 at 13:13
  • $\begingroup$ @GerryMyerson: Done, thank you. $\endgroup$
    – boxdot
    Sep 25, 2013 at 14:25
  • $\begingroup$ How do you prove the result in the smooth case? $\endgroup$ Sep 25, 2013 at 17:02
  • $\begingroup$ @finite: want a direct proof without reducing to the smooth case ? $\endgroup$
    – Cantlog
    Sep 25, 2013 at 17:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Cantlog: although you are not asking me, I certainly would love to see a direct proof ! $\endgroup$ Sep 25, 2013 at 17:56

1 Answer 1

7
$\begingroup$

The smooth locus of $X(\mathbb C)$ is Zarisk dense, hence dense for the complex topology, in $X(\mathbb C)$. So it is enough to prove the density for smooth varieties, and you already known how to do it.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Dear @Cantlog, the smooth locus $X^{sm} \subset X$ is Zariski-dense, but why it is also dense in the complex topology? The latter topology is much finer as the Zariski-topology. $\endgroup$
    – boxdot
    Sep 26, 2013 at 8:41
  • $\begingroup$ @finite: good question ! See edit. $\endgroup$
    – Cantlog
    Sep 26, 2013 at 8:50
  • $\begingroup$ @finite: see also Mumford, "Complex Projective Varieties", Theorem 2.33, p.38. $\endgroup$ Sep 26, 2013 at 9:10
  • $\begingroup$ By the way, this is not the best book he wrote, compared to the great "Red book" and "Abelian varieties". $\endgroup$
    – Cantlog
    Sep 26, 2013 at 9:13

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .