Find an open subset of $\mathbb{A}^2$ which (with its given Zariski topology) cannot be isomorphic to any affine variety. [Delete the point (0,0).]

My problem is I don't know how to prove it is impossible for a subset of $\mathbb{A}^2$ to be isomorphic to any affine variety.

  • $\begingroup$ This was nicely discussed on this site recently by David Speyer. Someone who is better than I am at searching can probably supply the link. $\endgroup$ – Pete L. Clark Jul 8 '11 at 8:27
  • $\begingroup$ I'm sorry, but I can't see the site... Would you please post the site once more? Thank you very much. $\endgroup$ – ShinyaSakai Jul 8 '11 at 8:41
  • $\begingroup$ @Pete: Dear pete, the best idea I can think of is to go to David Speyer's page and search his answers tagged in the algebraic geometry/topology section. $\endgroup$ – user9413 Jul 8 '11 at 9:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The idea is that each regular function around $0$ naturally extends to it, so if it was an affine variety then it would be isomorphic to the whole space $A^2$. Because they would share the same regular functions. Unfortunately I need some time to give you a formal proof, because there are some technical details to fill in. $\endgroup$ – Giovanni De Gaetano Jul 8 '11 at 10:00
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ OK, see David Speyer's answer to this question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/47356/… $\endgroup$ – Pete L. Clark Jul 8 '11 at 10:07

Let me just mention a slightly more elementary (local-cohomology free) version of David Speyer's answer in the thread mentioned in the comments. Let $X$ be an affine normal scheme, and let $Z$ be a subset of codimension at least 2 (but nonempty). Then $X-Z$ is not affine. Indeed, $X-Z$ has the same ring of global sections as $X$, by the so-called "algebraic Hartogs lemma" (namely, that singularities of a rational function occur in codimension one for a normal scheme). So if $X-Z$ were affine, the natural map $X-Z \to X$ would be an isomorphism (as both have the same regular functions), which it is clearly not.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ $@$Akhil: +1. Your answer nicely captures the basic phenomenon at work. $\endgroup$ – Pete L. Clark Jul 8 '11 at 19:15

And let me mention an even more elementary answer, expanding on Amitesh's hint.

Let $U$ be the punctured affine plane. Assuming that we have shown that there are no regular functions on $\mathbb{A}^2$ which vanish only at one point (I believe this follows from Krull's Hauptidealsatz), then it is clear that a regular function on $U$ is just the same thing as a regular function on $\mathbb{A}^2$. So its ring of regular functions is isomorphic to the ring of regular functions of $\mathbb{A}^2$.

Now consider the embedding $\Phi : U \hookrightarrow \mathbb{A}^2$. If $U$ were affine, then, by the equivalence of categories between $k\textbf{-Var}$ and (a certain full subcategory of) $k\textbf{-Alg}$, $\Phi$ is an isomorphism of varieties if and only if it induces an isomorphism of coordinate rings, and $\Phi$ does induce an isomorphism on each ring of regular functions. Yet $\Phi$ clearly cannot be an isomorphism as it is not surjective on points—a contradiction. So $U$ isn't affine.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer. Although I cannot understand some details, I'll read your answer again when I know more on this subject. $\endgroup$ – ShinyaSakai Jul 9 '11 at 8:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.