3
$\begingroup$

This question already has an answer here:

It is easy to show that if $M$ is a Noetherian $R$-module then $R/\mbox{ann}(M)$ is a Noetherian ring. Is there a similar (or dual) result for Artinian modules?

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by rschwieb, Eric Wofsey, user26857, Claude Leibovici, Tom-Tom Sep 22 '15 at 8:25

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The title you picked for your question is almost completely unrelated to the question itself! $\endgroup$ – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Jul 8 '11 at 3:37
  • $\begingroup$ I hope there is no mathematical term for "relevant", but what I meant was that if any Artinian module can be reduced to an Artinian module over an Artinian ring (as is the case for Notherian modules), then there is no point considering Artinian modules over non-Artinian rings. $\endgroup$ – ashpool Jul 8 '11 at 19:17
  • $\begingroup$ simple modules, and finite length modules are intensively studied for all rings, including non-artinian rings. That's what representation theory mostly does! $\endgroup$ – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Jul 8 '11 at 22:24
5
$\begingroup$

If $M$ is an Artinian $R$-module, then so is any submodule and any quotient of $M$. Thus if $M$ is finitely generated, then $R/\mathrm{Ann}(M)$ is Artinian.
But $\mathbb{Z}[1/p]/\mathbb{Z}$ is a non finitely generated Artinian $\mathbb{Z}$-module and $\mathbb{Z}$ is not Artinian. Thus if $M$ is an Artinian $R$-module, then $R$ is not necessary Artinian. (See the article of wiki about Artinian module.)

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In fact, every ring has artinian modules, becaue it has maximal left ideals. $\endgroup$ – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Jul 9 '11 at 20:59
  • $\begingroup$ right. if we donot require the ring is commutative. then,the maximal left ideal is not necessary a two side ideal. $\endgroup$ – wxu Jul 10 '11 at 6:04
  • $\begingroup$ I don't see how that is related... $\endgroup$ – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Jul 10 '11 at 6:07
  • $\begingroup$ what i mean is that if ann(M) is an two side ideal, we may view M as a R/ann(M) module. anyway, since the op taged the post as commutative algebra, i think he prefer to thinking commutative rings. $\endgroup$ – wxu Jul 10 '11 at 6:21
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Why is $R/\mathrm{Ann}(M)$ Artinian exactly? $\endgroup$ – D_S Sep 22 '15 at 4:12

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.