My question is about using "decrease by" without any ambiguity.

I'm reading a paper where the authors consider a set $X$ defined respectively to a tree and an operation on the tree updating the tree and hence an "updated $X$".

They imply the following meaning : $|updated(X)| \leq \frac{4}{5} \cdot |X|$.

But they use three different sentences in two distinct versions of their paper.

Is there a way to remove all ambiguity in the following sentences, what should be considered the correct sentence in english?

First type:

  • The size of X decreases by 1/5.
  • The size of X decreases by 4/5.

Second type:

  • The size of X decreases by a 1/5. (used)
  • The size of X decreases by a 4/5.

Third type:

  • The size of X decreases by a factor of 1/5. (used)
  • The size of X decreases by a factor of 4/5. (used)

The first type seems to me unambiguous but additive. I think it should be interpreted as $|updated(X)| \leq |X| - 1/5$ (ok it doesn't make much sense to remove a real < 1 to a cardinal but the question is valid for any quantity x and is more about natural languages here...).

My feeling is that:

  • The size of X decreases by a 1/5.
  • The size of X decreases by a factor of 4/5.

are valid if:

  • I understand the "a" in the first sentence to denote that 1/5 is a short-hand for "a fifth" (of the global size) that has to be removed (to the global size).
  • I understand "decreases by a factor of" as "is multiplied by a factor of (and, by the way, that factor appears to be smaller than one)".

Question 1: What do you consider the correct understanding of these three types of sentences?

Question 2: Can it be unambiguous and "context-free"?

Question 3: Do you know other sentences that are unambiguous and "context-free" to carry this meaning without adding more mathematical notations?

Thanks, best regards,

Laurent Lyaudet
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ (No native speaker!) The way fractions are read, the denominator works as a number word, so $\frac15$ is "one fifth" not "a one-fifth" to me - I disagree with type 2. I'd use the first variant of the first type, and if you really want to avoid an additive (or rather sutractive) interpretation, say "by 20%" instead of "by $\frac15$". Alternatively, use the second variant of the third type with a neutral verb ("changes by a factor of $\frac45$"); it's okay to use "grow" with a factor $>1$, but "decrease" with a factor $<1$ is at least confusing - one won't say "I lost minus ten dollars" either. $\endgroup$ Sep 22, 2013 at 10:39

1 Answer 1


(Native speaker). Completely unambiguous phrases are:

(1) X decreases to 4/5 of its original value

(2) X decreases to 80% of its original value

(3) X decreases by a factor of 1/5

Two fairly unambiguous ones are:

(4) X decreases by 20%

(5) there is a 20% reduction in the value of X

Both of these are ambiguous if X is itself a percentage measure.

Your "second type" is not quite English. A native speaker would say "one fifth" or "a fifth", but would not write "a 1/5".

Also, if it's relevant, there are no differences between various English-speaking countries in this regard, as far as I know.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.