0
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathcal C$ be a category. Why does the Functor $\mathcal F:\emptyset \to \mathcal C$ exist? In general $Ob(\mathcal C)$ is not a set, so $\mathcal F:\emptyset \to Ob(\mathcal C)$ is not a function and i don't have the vacuous condition from the set-theoretic case, right?

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

When the set of objects is not a set for you, what is it then? A class perhaps? Note that still for every class $T$ there is a unique map $\emptyset \to T$. Recall that a map $S \to T$ between classes is just a formula $\phi$ (actually a subclass of $S \times T$) such that $\forall s (s \in S \Longrightarrow \exists ! t \in T (\phi(s,t))$. If $S=\emptyset$, this is satisfied for every $\phi$ (but all of them define the same map).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ sorry, i was dazzled by the class notion which is very new to me but no sorcery at all, though :) $\endgroup$ – user83496 Sep 17 '13 at 13:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.