The question is are the following assertions true:
I.(strong version) Consider $a,b\in {\bf R}$, $a<b$.
(1) If $u\in {\rm BV}([a,b])$, and
(2) if $u$ is an injection on $[a,b]$,
then $u$ is strictly monotonic on $[a,b]$.
II.(weak version) If assumptions (1) and (2) are satisfied,
then $u$ is "piecewise strictly monotonic" on $[a,b]$, meaning that there exists at most countably many disjoint sub-intervals $(a_k,b_k)$ such that $u_0$ is strictly monotonic on $(a_k,b_k)$ for every $k\in{\bf N}$ and such that $[a,b]=\cup_{k=1}^{+\infty}(a_k,b_k)\cup N$, where $\lambda(N)=0$.
Remark (A). It is already established that, under assumptions that $u\in {\rm C}([a,b])$ and that $u$ is injective on $[a,b]$, it follows that $u$ is strictly monotonic on $[a,b]$(see
Continuous injective map is strictly monotonic
) But, in our setting, we do not assume continuity.
Remark (B). If we add the assumption that $u([a,b])$ is an interval, then $u$ satisfies the intermediate-value property, and the claim follows even without the assumption that $u\in {\rm BV}([a,b])$, see
Injective functions with intermediate-value property are continuous. Better proof?
Indeed, it follows that $u\in {\rm C}([a,b])$, and so the assertion follows by Remark (A).
Remark (C). Here is somewhat similar(but ultimately different) question which is settled:
Why is a strictly monotonic mapping between intervals continuous?
Remark (D). I observe that, if $u\in {\rm BV}([a,b])$, then there exist two strictly(!) increasing functions $u_1,u_2:[a,b]\rightarrow {\bf R}$ such that $u=u_1-u_2$. Therefore $u_1$ and $u_2$ are injections. I don't know if this helps.
In any case, I was not able to find any similar result about BV-functions in the literature.