Maybe this helps
$$(6x+5)y - x - 2 = (6w+7)z - w + 4$$
$$(6x+5)y - (x + 3) = (6w+7)z - (w - 3)$$
$$a = x+3,b = w-3$$
$$(6(a-3)+5)y - a = (6(b+3)+7)z - b$$
$$(6a - 13)y - a = (6b +25)z - b$$
$$6ay + b = 6bz + 25z + 13 y + a$$
$$(3a+y)^2 = 9a^2 + 6ay + y^2$$
$$(3b+z)^2 = 9b^2 + 6bz + z^2$$
$$(3a+y)^2 + 9b^2 + z^2 + b = (3b+z)^2 + 9a^2 + y^2 + 25 z + 13 y + a$$
This equation has many solutions.
The sum of 3 squares is a very dense set.
We can even express variables in terms of each other.
for instance $a=b,y=z$ reduces to
$25 z + 13 y = 0$
$$z = 25 k , z = -13 k$$
for integer $k$.
Or if $a=y=0$ we get
$$ b = 6bz + 25z $$
$$ 0 = b(6z-1) + 25 z$$
and the only solutions of that are
$b = -5,z=1$
$b=z=-4$
$b=z=0$
So on the one hand we have many solutions, probably to many to fit in a single algebraic parameterisation.
We can even write variables as functions of each other.
On the other hand some special cases only have a finite number of solutions.
So I suspect that there are $2$ or $3$ almost free variables and thus it is more like a relation than an equation.
Therefore I assume no closed form solution exists.
$4$ or $5$ variables is maybe surprisingly much.
Consider
$$(z + 2 - gh)(z - xy) = 0$$
this relates to prime twins if all variables are larger than 1. And I assume there is no parameterisation for $z$.