3
$\begingroup$

Real Skew Symmetric $3\times 3$ matrix has one eigen value $2i$ so another eigen value is $-2i$ another eigen value must be $0$ right? as we know these kind of matrix has eigen values $0$ or purely imaginary.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. $\quad\mu^{*} = \mu\quad$ and $\quad\mu^{*} = -\mu\quad$ $\Longrightarrow\quad\mu = 0$. $\endgroup$ – Felix Marin Sep 13 '13 at 19:50
1
$\begingroup$

Yes, the characteristic polynomial of a real $3\times 3$ matrix will be a real cubic polynomial. If not identically zero, the real skew matrix will have one pair of conjugate imaginary eigenvalues and a zero eigenvalue, each of multiplicity one.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Does this eliminate the possibility of eigenvalues $2i,2i,-2i$? $\endgroup$ – Rebecca J. Stones Sep 13 '13 at 16:48
  • $\begingroup$ @Rebecca: Yes, it does (for a 3x3 real skew matrix). $\endgroup$ – hardmath Sep 13 '13 at 17:17
  • $\begingroup$ In case someone has doubts, the characteristic polynomial being a real cubic "eliminates the possibility" of three purely imaginary nonzero roots. Since these must occur in conjugate pairs, divding out a monic quadratic with one such pair as roots gives as quotient a real degree 1 polynomial having the third purely imaginary nonzero root (contradiction). $\endgroup$ – hardmath Sep 13 '13 at 21:50
3
$\begingroup$

In general, a real skew-symmetric $3 \times 3$ matrix $K$ looks like

$K = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & a & b \\ -a & 0 & c \\ -b & -c & 0 \end{bmatrix}, \tag{1}$

so that the characteristic polynomial is

$\det(\lambda - K) = \lambda^3 + (a^2 + b^2 + c^2) \lambda, \tag{2}$

which is easily seen to have roots

$\lambda = 0, \pm i\sqrt{a^2 + b^2 + c^2}, \tag{3}$

which follow the general pattern the OP suggested; apparently the matrix she/he was thinking of satisfies $\sqrt{a^2 + b^2 + c^2} = 2$; but $0$ will always be an eigenvalue for such $K$ in any case.

Hope this helps. Cheers.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Since a real matrix $A$ is skew if, and only if, $A=-A^T$, since $\text{spec} (A)=\text{spec}(A^T)=-\text{spec}(-A^T)$ and since the characteristic polynomial has degree $3$ and non-real roots come in pairs, it follows that $0\in\text{spec}(A)\cap \text{spec}(A^T)$.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

We know that a skew symmetric matrix $A=(a_{ij})_{3 \times 3}$ satisfies $A^T=-A$. This means that $a_{ii}=-a_{ii}$ or equivalently $a_{ii}=0$ for all $i \in \{1,2,3\}$.

We know the trace of $A$ is the sum of its eigenvalues, which is $0$ since the main diagonal of $A$ comprises of zeroes.

Since a $3 \times 3$ matrix has $3$ (not necessarily distinct) eigenvalues (given by the roots of the characteristic polynomial [a degree $3$ polynomial with leading coefficient either $1$ or $(-1)^3$, depending on how it's defined]), there is precisely one other eigenvalue $\lambda$ and we must have $2i-2i+\lambda=0$, which implies $\lambda=0$.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Here's another way of looking at it, which I thought of after posting my previous answer.

The approach here seemed sufficiently different that I felt a separate answer was merited. Hope I'm not overdoing it. Anyway . . .

First, note that for any skew-symmetric, real matrix, the only possible real eigenvalue is zero. For, if $K$ is real skew-symmetric, so that $K^T = -K$, and if $v \ne 0$ is an eigenvector with real eigenvalue $\lambda$, so that

$Kv = \lambda v, \tag{1}$

we have

$\langle Kv, v \rangle = \lambda \langle v, v \rangle, \tag{2}$

but

$\langle Kv, v \rangle = \langle v, K^Tv \rangle = \langle v, -Kv \rangle = -\langle Kv, v \rangle, \tag{3}$

or

$\lambda \langle v, v \rangle = -\lambda \langle v, v \rangle, \tag{4}$

and since $\langle v, v \rangle \ne 0$ this shows that

$\lambda = - \lambda, \tag{5}$

whence

$\lambda = 0. \tag{6}$

Here I take $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle$ to be the standard inner product on the real vector space on which $K$ operates.

Now argue as follows: since $2i$ is an eigenvalue of $K$, and the characteristic polynomial of $K$ is real, $-2i$ is an eigenvalue as well. This means

$\lambda^2 + 4 \mid p_K(\lambda), \tag{7}$

where

$p_K(\lambda) = det(\lambda - K) \tag{8}$

is the characteristic polynomial of $K$. But $\deg p_K(\lambda) = 3$ in the present case, so the quotient polynomial $q(\lambda)$ is of degree $1$, i.e. we must have

$p_K(\lambda) = (\lambda^2 + 4)q(\lambda) \tag{9}$

with

$q(\lambda) = \lambda - a, \tag{10}$

$a$ real. But this of course implies $a$ is a real eigenvalue of $K$, whence we must have

$a = 0. \tag {11}$

Well, I hope this answer is more than mere mathematical logorrhea, and it sheds a little more light on the subject at hand.

Cheers!

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.