In Lecture Notes in Algebraic Topology, Davis & Kirk, it is written:

Proposition $\mathbf{2.4.}\,\,$ Let $R$ be a commutative ring and $a\in R$ a non-zero divisor (i.e. $ab=0$ implies $b=0$). Let $M$ be an $R$-module. Let $M/a=M/aM$ and $_aM=\{m\in M|am=0\}$. Then

$$ \begin{align} &1.\,\, R/a\otimes M \cong M/a, && 3.\,\,\operatorname{Hom}(R/a,M) \cong\ _aM, \\ &2. \,\,\operatorname{Tor}_1(R/a,M)\cong\ _aM, && 4.\,\,\operatorname{Ext}^1(R/a,M)\cong M/a. \\ \end{align} $$ Proof. Since $a$ is not a divisor of zero, there is a short exact sequence $$ 0\to R\xrightarrow[]{\times a}R\to R/A\to 0. $$ Apply the functors -$\otimes M$ and $\operatorname{Hom}(-,M)$ to the above short exact sequence. By the axioms we have exact sequences $$ 0\to\operatorname{Tor}_1(R/a,M)\to R\otimes M\to R\otimes M\to R/a\otimes M\to 0\text{$\,\,\,$ and} \\\,\\ 0\to\operatorname{Hom}(R/a,M)\to\operatorname{Hom}(R,M)\to\operatorname{Hom}(R,M)\to\operatorname{Ext}^1(R/a,M)\to 0. $$ The middle maps in the exact sequence above can be identified with $$ M\xrightarrow[]{\times a}M, $$ which has kernel $_aM$ and cokernel $M/a.\color{white}{\tag{$\color{black}{\square}$}}$

Question 1: Doesn't this claim work for arbitrary $a\in R$?

Question 2: Is there any nice formula for $\mathrm{Ext}^1_R(R/I,M)$ and $\mathrm{Tor}_1^R(R/I,M)$ given any ideal $I\unlhd R$?

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ 1. Of course not! Try $R=\mathbb Z_4$ and $a=\hat 2$; 2. $\mathrm{Tor}_1^R(R/I,R/J)\simeq I\cap J/IJ$ (see also here). About Ext there is already a similar question. $\endgroup$ – user26857 Sep 9 '13 at 0:11
  • $\begingroup$ You're right! I don't know why, but strangely enough I was only checking exactness in $0\to R\to R\to R/a\to0$ at the middle and end. Thank you. $\endgroup$ – Leon Sep 9 '13 at 0:51

(Answered for future reference) YACP has already shown you why question 1 fails. For question 2, the natural thing to consider is the exact sequence $\newcommand{Hom}{\operatorname{Hom}}$ $\newcommand{Ext}{\operatorname{Ext}}$ $\newcommand{Tor}{\operatorname{Tor}}$ $\DeclareMathOperator{coker}{coker}$

$$0 \to I \to R \to R/I \to 0$$

Applying the functors $\Hom_R(\_, M)$ and $\_ \otimes_R M$ yield descriptions of $\Ext^1(R/I,M)$ and $\Tor_1(R/I,M)$ as a cokernel and kernel, respectively. To be precise,

$$\Ext^1_R(R/I,M) = \coker(M \xrightarrow{\phi} \Hom_R(I,M)),$$ $$\Tor_1^R(R/I,M) = \ker(I \otimes_R M \xrightarrow{\varphi} M)$$

where the maps $\phi, \varphi$ are defined by $\phi(m) = (i \mapsto im)$, $\varphi(i \otimes m) = im$ (incidentally, the kernel of $\phi$ and cokernel of $\varphi$ are $\Ext^0(R/I,M)$ and $\Tor_0(R/I,M)$ respectively, but these are easier to describe: they are $0 :_M I$ and $M/IM$). From this description one easily obtains that if $M = R/J$ is cyclic, then $\Tor_1(R/I,R/J) \cong I \cap J/IJ$.

In general though (and for general $M$), one is usually interested in finding when $\Ext$ and $\Tor$ vanish (vanishing typically gives the most useful information). In this regard, one can say that over a Noetherian ring $R$, if $0 :_M I = 0$ (i.e. $M$ has no $I$-torsion), then $\Ext^1(R/I,M) = 0$ iff the depth of $I$ on $M$ is at least $2$.

One last note: in certain cases, one is able to view an $\Ext$ module as a $\Hom$ in disguise, in the following sense: if $N, M$ are $R$-modules, and $\text{ann}(N)$ contains a weak $M$-sequence $a_1,...,a_n$, then $\Ext^n_R(N,M) \cong \Hom_R(N, M/(a_1,...,a_n)M)$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.