0
$\begingroup$

Let vectors $v_1,v_2,\dots, v_n$ be linearly independent.

Let $v$ be a vector s.t. $v,v_1,v_2,\dots,v_n$ are linearly dependent. How do I prove that $v$ is a linear combination of $v_1,v_2,\dots,v_n$?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What is the definition of "linear independence" you are using? What have you tried? $\endgroup$ – Andrés E. Caicedo Sep 7 '13 at 17:41
  • $\begingroup$ Write down what it means for $v,v_1,...v_n$ to be linearly dependent. Then use the other condition to show that the multiplier for $v$ is non-zero. Divide across by this constant. $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Sep 7 '13 at 17:49
  • $\begingroup$ To me it means is v1,v2 ... vn are linearly independent then a1v1 + a2v2...... + anvn = 0 has only trivial solution i.e. a1=a2 =.... an = 0 $\endgroup$ – Hashtag Sep 7 '13 at 17:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There is a definition of linear independence: $v_k$ are linearly independet iff $\sum_k \alpha_k v_k = 0$ implies $\alpha_k = 0$. $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Sep 7 '13 at 17:55
  • $\begingroup$ Logically the answer is obvious but how can it be proven mathematically $\endgroup$ – Hashtag Sep 7 '13 at 18:11
4
$\begingroup$

If $v,v_1,\ldots ,v_n$ are linearly dependent over $k$ then $rv+r_1v_1+\cdots +r_nv_n=0$ with some $r,r_i\in k$ not all zero. Suppose that $r=0$. Then all $r_i=0$ because $v_1,\ldots ,v_n$ are linearly independent over $k$. This is a contradiction, because not all $r_i$ and $r$ are zero. Hence $r\neq 0$ and we have $$ v=-r^{-1}(r_1v_1+\cdots +r_nv_n). $$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.