0
$\begingroup$

I haven't done a surface integral in a while so I am asking to get this checked.

enter image description here

$\mathbf{F} = \langle x, y, z\rangle$ and the surface is $z = xy + 1$ where $0\leq x,y\leq 1$.

$\hat{\mathbf{n}} = \nabla f/ \lvert\nabla f\rvert = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\langle 1, 1, 1\rangle$

$dS = \frac{\lvert\nabla f\rvert dxdy}{\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}} = \sqrt{3}dxdy$

$\mathbf{F}\cdot\hat{\mathbf{n}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}(x+y+z) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}(x+y+xy + 1)$

$$ \int_0^1\int_0^1(x + y + xy + 1)dxdy = \frac{9}{4} $$

However, when I used the divergence theorem, I obtained:

$$ \int_S(\mathbf{F}\cdot\hat{\mathbf{n}})dS = \int_V(\nabla\cdot\mathbf{F})dV $$ and $\nabla\cdot\mathbf{F} = 3$ so $$ \int 3dV = 3V = 3\frac{5}{4} = \frac{15}{4} $$

Which one is wrong or are both incorrect? If so, what is wrong?

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

I'm afraid neither is correct. You confused derivatives of $\mathbf F$ with calculating the surface normal. The Divergence Theorem does not apply, as you do not have a closed surface (so there's no volume $V$ enclosed). And to compute the surface integral you need to compute $$\int_0^1\int_0^1 \mathbf F(\mathbf g(x,y))\cdot \left(\frac{\partial\mathbf g}{\partial x}\times\frac{\partial\mathbf g}{\partial y}\right) \,dx\,dy\,,$$ where $\mathbf g(x,y) = (x,y,xy+1)$. This becomes $$\int_0^1\int_0^1 (1-xy)\,dx\,dy = \frac34\,.$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Well, perhaps you didn't fully state the problem. In your terse statement, you gave us $\mathbf F$ and you said "and the surface is ..." :) $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin Sep 7 '13 at 16:40
  • $\begingroup$ Forget the cube. Make a closed surface by adding in three faces (bottom, right, back in your picture). The total flux outward across all four faces is $3$ times the volume enclosed. So you now need to subtract the flux across the three faces you've appended to answer your original question. $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin Sep 7 '13 at 17:16
  • $\begingroup$ What exactly do you not understand? $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin Sep 7 '13 at 17:44
  • $\begingroup$ The integral of divergence over the region, yes. But this gives the flux across all of the bounding surface. Your top surface is only part of what needs to be a closed surface. $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin Sep 7 '13 at 18:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.