4
$\begingroup$

I am reading a paper by Berezin, entitled General Concept of Quantization. He writes:

enter image description here

and then:

enter image description here

This ought to be some clever manipulation of matrices and yet I am not able to show how (1.4) follows from (1.1) if $\omega$ is given to be invertible.

Any leads?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ It should follow from the fact that $d(\omega^{ij}\omega_{jk})=0$. The main issue is how was (1.1) derived (perhaps footnote 1 explains it)? $\endgroup$
    – Ted Black
    Commented Feb 16 at 10:54
  • $\begingroup$ @TedBlack (1.1) is taken as the definition. The footnote is just a comment on how the repeated index notation will stand for sum. Btw, I did try doing that already, and didn't seem to get anywhere... :/ $\endgroup$
    – Atom
    Commented Feb 16 at 10:56

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

If we multiply, $$\omega^{\gamma k}\frac{\partial \omega^{\alpha\beta}}{\partial x^k} +\omega^{\beta k}\frac{\partial \omega^{\gamma\alpha}}{\partial x^k} +\omega^{\alpha k}\frac{\partial \omega^{\beta\gamma}}{\partial x^k}=0$$ by $\omega_{i\alpha}\omega_{j\beta}\omega_{l\gamma}$ we get, $$ \omega_{i\alpha}\omega_{j\beta}\omega_{l\gamma}\omega^{\gamma k}\frac{\partial \omega^{\alpha\beta}}{\partial x^k} +\omega_{i\alpha}\omega_{j\beta}\omega_{l\gamma}\omega^{\beta k}\frac{\partial \omega^{\gamma\alpha}}{\partial x^k} +\omega_{i\alpha}\omega_{j\beta}\omega_{l\gamma}\omega^{\alpha k}\frac{\partial \omega^{\beta\gamma}}{\partial x^k}=0 $$ Since $\omega_{l\gamma}\omega^{\gamma k}=\delta^k_l$, $\omega_{j\beta}\omega^{\beta k}=\delta^k_j$, $\omega_{i\alpha}\omega^{\alpha k}=\delta^k_i$ we have, $$ \omega_{i\alpha}\omega_{j\beta}\delta^k_l\frac{\partial \omega^{\alpha\beta}}{\partial x^k} +\omega_{i\alpha}\omega_{l\gamma}\delta^k_j\frac{\partial \omega^{\gamma\alpha}}{\partial x^k} +\omega_{j\beta}\omega_{l\gamma}\delta^k_i\frac{\partial \omega^{\beta\gamma}}{\partial x^k}=0 $$ or, \begin{equation} \omega_{i\alpha}\omega_{j\beta}\frac{\partial \omega^{\alpha\beta}}{\partial x^l} +\omega_{i\alpha}\omega_{l\gamma}\frac{\partial \omega^{\gamma\alpha}}{\partial x^j} +\omega_{j\beta}\omega_{l\gamma}\frac{\partial \omega^{\beta\gamma}}{\partial x^i}=0 \tag{I} \label{I} \end{equation} Since, $$ \omega_{i\alpha}\omega^{\alpha \beta} = \delta^\beta_i $$ we have, $$ \omega_{i\alpha} \frac{\partial \omega^{\alpha \beta}}{\partial x^l} + \omega^{\alpha \beta} \frac{\partial \omega_{i\alpha}}{\partial x^l}=0 \Rightarrow \omega_{i\alpha} \frac{\partial \omega^{\alpha \beta}}{\partial x^l}=- \omega^{\alpha \beta} \frac{\partial \omega_{i\alpha}}{\partial x^l} $$ In the same way, $$ \omega_{l\gamma} \frac{\partial \omega^{\gamma \alpha}}{\partial x^j}=- \omega^{\gamma\alpha} \frac{\partial \omega_{l\gamma}}{\partial x^j} $$ and, $$ \omega_{j\beta} \frac{\partial \omega^{\beta \gamma}}{\partial x^i}=- \omega^{\beta\gamma} \frac{\partial \omega_{j\beta}}{\partial x^i} $$ So we can rewrite (\ref{I}) as, $$ -\omega_{j\beta}\omega^{\alpha\beta} \frac{\partial \omega_{i\alpha}}{\partial x^l} -\omega_{i\alpha}\omega^{\gamma\alpha} \frac{\partial \omega_{l\gamma}}{\partial x^j} -\omega_{l\gamma}\omega^{\beta\gamma} \frac{\partial \omega_{j\beta}}{\partial x^i} =0 $$ Using the skew-symmetric property of $\omega$ we have, $$ \omega_{j\beta}\omega^{\beta\alpha} \frac{\partial \omega_{i\alpha}}{\partial x^l} +\omega_{i\alpha}\omega^{\alpha\gamma} \frac{\partial \omega_{l\gamma}}{\partial x^j} +\omega_{l\gamma}\omega^{\gamma\beta} \frac{\partial \omega_{j\beta}}{\partial x^i} =0 $$ and since $\omega_{j\beta}\omega^{\beta\alpha}=\delta^\alpha_j$, $\omega_{i\alpha}\omega^{\alpha\gamma}=\delta^\gamma_i$, $\omega_{l\gamma}\omega^{\gamma\beta}=\delta^\beta_l$ we have, $$ \delta^\alpha_j \frac{\partial \omega_{i\alpha}}{\partial x^l} +\delta^\gamma_i \frac{\partial \omega_{l\gamma}}{\partial x^j} +\delta^\beta_l \frac{\partial \omega_{j\beta}}{\partial x^i} =0 $$ or, $$ \frac{\partial \omega_{ij}}{\partial x^l} + \frac{\partial \omega_{li}}{\partial x^j} + \frac{\partial \omega_{jl}}{\partial x^i} =0 $$ Replace $l$ with $k$: $$ \frac{\partial \omega_{ij}}{\partial x^k} + \frac{\partial \omega_{ki}}{\partial x^j} + \frac{\partial \omega_{jk}}{\partial x^i} =0 $$ to get (1.4).

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ That was super! How did you intuit that? Also, can you confirm that anti-symmetry is used in proving both directions? $\endgroup$
    – Atom
    Commented Feb 16 at 13:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Nothing like that, just threw darts until I hit the board. Let me come back to you on the skew-symmetric part. $\endgroup$
    – Ted Black
    Commented Feb 16 at 14:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Added a few more steps for the reverse direction; the use of the skew-symmetric property is shown. $\endgroup$
    – Ted Black
    Commented Feb 16 at 14:39
  • $\begingroup$ There was a mistake in last derivation; somehow I managed to insert the tensor product in the partials. This is not the case; instead we have to use $\omega_{i\alpha}\omega^{\alpha\beta}=\delta^\beta_i$ to derive a relation between the partial of the covariant and contravariant tensors. $\endgroup$
    – Ted Black
    Commented Feb 16 at 17:41
  • $\begingroup$ I wish there was a way to upvote it twice! $\endgroup$
    – Atom
    Commented Feb 16 at 22:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .