Consider the polynomial $x^4+5\in \mathbb{Q}[x]$ and Let $E/\mathbb{Q}$ be its splitting field. I would like to calculate $G = \operatorname{Gal}(E/ \mathbb{Q})$. It should be a standard exercise, but for some reason I get stuck at some point.

Let me say what I can tell. First, $E=\mathbb{Q}[\alpha,i]$ where $\alpha$ is any root of $x^4+5$. Thus, $E$ has the two subfields $\mathbb{Q}[\alpha]$ and $\mathbb{Q}[i]$ of degrees $4$ and $2$ over $\mathbb{Q}$ respectively. This forces the degree of $E$ to be either $4$ or $8$ depending on whether $i\in \mathbb{Q}[\alpha]$ or not (I know how to justify all the above claims), and this is the point where I'm stuck.

It seems to me that $[E:\mathbb{Q}]=8$, but I can't prove it. The four roots of the polynomial are given explicitly by $({\pm 1 \pm i \over \sqrt{2}})5^{1/4}$. The case I am trying to rule out is that either of the roots generates $E$, but I can't find the right argument.

In either case, I know what the final answer should be. Since $G$ acts faithfully on the $4$ roots, $G$ embeds into $S_4$ and thus if $|G|=8$, then it should be isomorphic to $D_4$ (from the Sylow theorems). If on the other hand $|G|=4$, having the two different quadratic subextensions $\mathbb{Q}[i]$ and $\mathbb{Q}[i\sqrt{5}]$ forces $G$ to be isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}/2\times \mathbb{Z}/2$.

up vote 5 down vote accepted

One way is: If $r=(-5)^{1/4}$, so that the splitting field is $L=\mathbb Q(r,i)$, then $Gal(L/\mathbb Q(i))$ is the cyclic group $C_4$, acting via $r\to i^k r$ ($k\in\mathbb Z$ mod 4). To see it: it is certainly a subgroup of this group; if it's a proper subgroup then $r^2$ is fixed, i.e. $r^2\in\mathbb Q(i)$. But that's not possible: $-5=(a+ib)^2$ has evidently no rational solutions. From this we get that $Gal(L/\mathbb Q)$ is $r\mapsto ri^k$, $i\mapsto\pm i$, which is the dihedral group.

[edited to become a 'pure Galois' proof]

  • 1
    Great! I like this proof very much, so I will accept this answer. even though there were perfectly good answers before it (hope it's ok) – KotelKanim Sep 7 '13 at 14:55

This is a tower of quadratic extensions, and there are general tools to deal with this kind of situation. Some time ago, I explained the general machinery in a more complicated case here.

EDIT : In your example :

The number $2$ is not a square in ${\mathbb Q}[\sqrt{5}]$, because neither $2$ nor $2 \times 5$ are squares in $\mathbb Q$ (by “Extension rule 1” , see the reference).

The number $2$ is a square in ${\mathbb Q}[\sqrt[4]{5}]$ iff the equation $x^4+\frac{\sqrt{5}}{4}=0$ has a solution in ${\mathbb Q}[\sqrt{5}]$ (by Extension rule 2) and this is not the case.

So $\sqrt{2}\not\in {\mathbb Q}[\sqrt[4]{5}]$, and the extension $F={\mathbb Q}[\sqrt[4]{5},\sqrt{2}]$ has degree $8$ over $\mathbb Q$.

Since $F \subseteq {\mathbb R}$, we see that $L=F[i]={\mathbb Q}[\sqrt[4]{5},\sqrt{2},i]$ has degree $16$ over $\mathbb Q$.

The elements of ${\sf Gal}(L/{\mathbb Q})$ are easily described by their action on $\sqrt[4]{5},\sqrt{2},i$. Then, it is not hard to find the subgroup fixing $E$, and to deduce that $[E:\mathbb Q]=8$.

  • Ok, thanks. I will look at the reference, but the second "fact" is not obvious to me. I mean, it is "obvious" that it is true, but it's not obvious how to prove it. Could you please elaborate on this? – KotelKanim Sep 7 '13 at 7:29
  • Well, actually I think I got it. You can calculate the intersection with the real field and then it is clear. Right? – KotelKanim Sep 7 '13 at 7:31
  • @KotelKanim I edited/corrected my answer, it is hopefully clearer now. – Ewan Delanoy Sep 7 '13 at 7:59
  • +1 Going via the route of the degree 16 extension is a nice trick. Furthermore, it takes care of my earlier objection :-) – Jyrki Lahtonen Sep 7 '13 at 8:03

This may not be very useful to you, but here goes anyway.

We see that $-5$ is of order four in the field $K=\mathbb{F}_{13}$. Therefore its fourth roots are necessarily of order sixteen in some extension field of $K$. The smallest extension field of $K$ that contains sixteenth roots of unity is the field $\mathbb{F}_{13^4}$. Therefore $x^4+5$ is irreducible in $K[x]$. By a well known result this implies that the action of the Galois group of $x^4+5$ over $\mathbb{Q}$ as a group of permutations on its roots contains a 4-cycle. This rules out the Klein four group, and settles your question.

  • Wow. This is nice. It is useful, but I did hope for a proof using only first-course-in-Galois-theory stuff. – KotelKanim Sep 7 '13 at 8:00
  • Yeah. I am a bit disappointed at myself for not coming up with a more elementary way. – Jyrki Lahtonen Sep 7 '13 at 8:01

To show that $[E:\mathbb{Q}]=8$ it is enough to show that $i\notin \mathbb{Q}(\alpha)$ for $\alpha=\frac{1+i}{\sqrt{2}}5^{1/4}$ , since then $$[E:\mathbb{Q}]=[\mathbb{Q}(\alpha,i):\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)][\mathbb{Q}(\alpha):\mathbb{Q}]=2\cdot 4=8.$$

So write $$i=a+b\frac{1+i}{\sqrt{2}}5^{1/4}=a+\frac{b}{\sqrt{2}}5^{1/4}+i\frac{b}{\sqrt{2}}5^{1/4} $$ Then we must have $\frac{b}{\sqrt{2}}5^{1/4}=1$ so $5^{1/2}=\frac{2}{b^{2}}\in\mathbb{Q}$ which is not possible.

Your Answer


By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.