0
$\begingroup$

How does one evaluate the following limits?

1) $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{k=n}^\infty 1$

2) $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{k=n}^\infty k^{-1}$

3) $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{k=n}^\infty 2^{-k}$

Do all three limits evaluate to $0$? If so, why? Perhaps only the third limit evaluates to $0$, while the first two are undefined. Again, why? @PeterTamaroff pointed out that the first two limits are undefined for fixed $n$, but does that necessarily imply they are undefined in the limit?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ All three terms are already meaningless for any fixed $n$. One can study the limit of a sequence if one really has one. $\endgroup$ – Pedro Tamaroff Sep 5 '13 at 3:25
  • $\begingroup$ @PeterTamaroff True, but does that necessarily imply they are meaningless as $n \rightarrow \infty$? Also, in light of your comment, I've edited the third limit so that it is meaningful for fixed $n$. $\endgroup$ – Colin T Bowers Sep 5 '13 at 3:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I repeat: if you want to talk about $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty} s_n$, the $s_n$ have to be "something". In this case, at best, we can say $s_n=+\infty$. In the third case, the limit is $0$; since you're subtracting from $1$ the partial sums of $1+2^{-1}+\cdots$ that converge to it. $\endgroup$ – Pedro Tamaroff Sep 5 '13 at 3:31
  • $\begingroup$ @PeterTamaroff Thanks, I understand now :-) $\endgroup$ – Colin T Bowers Sep 5 '13 at 3:44
  • $\begingroup$ To whomever downvoted this question to -1: I've found a useful rule on StackExchange websites is to always explain a downvote in the comments. Some users may be more active in other communities and may not understand why a question in a particular community is considered a "bad" question. $\endgroup$ – Colin T Bowers Mar 31 '17 at 9:58
4
$\begingroup$

Consider the sequence $$\left(\sum_{k=n}^\infty 1\right)_{n \geq 1}.$$ This sequence is $$(\infty,\infty,\infty,\ldots).$$ Hence, if we wish to define a limit of this sequence, it should be $$\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{k=n}^\infty 1=\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \infty=\infty.$$

The second example is resolved in the same way (since the series is also divergent).

In the third case, the sequence is $$\left(\sum_{k=n}^\infty \frac{1}{2^k}\right)_{n \geq 1}.$$ Since $$\sum_{k \geq 1} \frac{1}{2^k}=1,$$ the sequence is $$(1,\tfrac{1}{2},\tfrac{1}{4},\ldots)$$ so $$\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{k=n}^\infty \frac{1}{2^k}=0.$$

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

As limits are usually defined, you can only take $\lim_{n \to \infty}$ of an actual sequence of real numbers, so the first two limits are in fact meaningless, while the third evaluates to $0$ since $\frac{1}{2^{n-1}} \to 0$.

However, it is possible to discuss convergence in the extended real line $\mathbb{R} \cup \{-\infty,\infty\} = [-\infty, \infty]$. In this framework, observe that the sequences of partial sums for the first two sums both approach $\infty$, so both sums are equal to $\infty$ for any fixed $n$. Then the first and second limits are the limit of the sequence $\infty, \infty, \infty, \dots$, which converges to $\infty$. The third limit is still $0$ as it was before.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, this is useful. I've given the answer tick to @Rebecca since you both provided the same answer but she posted first (by a small margin :-). Cheers. $\endgroup$ – Colin T Bowers Sep 5 '13 at 3:42
-1
$\begingroup$

Although your second sum

2) $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{k=n}^\infty k^{-1}$

converges to 0, it is intresting that

$\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{k=n}^{2n} k^{-1} = \ln 2$

looking for other cases that base index starts from some infinity?

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.