2
$\begingroup$

I have this problem with the fraction: Sylvia is among 12 students to have successfully taken successfully taken the challenging General Mathematics exam at the university. To pass it, in fact, it was necessary to succeed in both the first test and the second. She determines the number of students initially enrolled in the exam, knowing that the outcome of the first test was negative for $2/3$ of those enrolled and that the outcome of the second test was turned out negative for the $3/5$ of the remainder.


Let $x$ be the number of initially enrolled students for the exam.

In the first test, $\frac{2}{3}$ of the students failed, so $ \frac{1}{3}$ passed the first test. The number of students who passed the first test is $\frac{1}{3}x $. After the first test, $ \frac{2}{3}x $ students remain to take the second test. For the second test, $ \frac{3}{5} $ of the remaining students failed. So, the number of students who passed both the first and the second tests is $ \frac{2}{5} $ of the remaining $ \frac{2}{3}x $.

$$\frac{2}{5} \times \frac{2}{3}x = \frac{4}{15}x$$

Now, since Sylvia is among the 12 students who passed both tests:

$$ \frac{4}{15}x = 12 $$

To solve for $x$:

$$ x = \frac{12 \times 15}{4} = 45 $$

But the solution is $90$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ No, $\frac23x$ students failed, so $\frac13x$ students passed the first test. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 13 at 19:54
  • $\begingroup$ @TedShifrin Thank you very much. $\endgroup$
    – Sebastiano
    Commented Jan 13 at 20:03

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

The outcome of the second test was negative for $\frac{3}{5}$ of the remainder, i.e. $\frac{3}{5}$ of the people that passed the first test, failed the second one. Recall that we had $\frac{x}{3}$ people who passed the first test. So you have $$ \frac{2}{5} \times \frac{x}{3} = 12 $$ from which you correctly get $x = 90$.

In short: you just mixed up two numbers.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Please can you rewrite the whole problem, please? $\endgroup$
    – Sebastiano
    Commented Jan 13 at 20:03
  • $\begingroup$ Why? There is only one line which would need to be rewritten, and I wrote it in my answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 13 at 20:05

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .