1
$\begingroup$

We know $A \subseteq \mathbb{R}$ is null if given $\epsilon > 0$, there exists intervals $\{I_n\}_{n \geq 1}$ such that

$$ A \subseteq \bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty} I_n \text{ and } \sum|I_n| < \epsilon $$

My question is that if we change the words interval in the above definition with open intervals, closed intervals ,and intervals of the form $(a,b]$, $[a,b)$, then we get an equivalent notion?

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Yes, because $(a,b)\subseteq (a,b],[a,b)$ and $[a,b]=\{a\}\cup (a,b]$ and the lengths are the same. $\endgroup$ – walcher Sep 3 '13 at 8:46
-2
$\begingroup$

If you are dealing with Borel $\sigma$-field over $\mathbb{R}$ then for any property $P$ that depends only on the measure defined on that space, if $P$ holds for any one of the following class of sets, then it holds for any other class, and also for the entire Borel $\sigma$-field.

  • class of all intervals,
  • class of all open intervals,
  • class of all closed intervals,
  • class of all clopen intervals,
  • class of all half-lines etc.
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.