I know that a formula for an ellipse in terms of elementary functions doesn't exist. But I seem to have found an intuitive false-proof that the circumference of an ellipse with axes $a$ and $b$ equals $\pi(a + b)$, a generalization of $C = 2\pi r$. I'm not sure where exactly the mistake in my proof is.

Proof: We will prove the circumference of an ellipse is $\pi(a + b)$ by considering a smaller one inside it. The edge of the smaller one is “parallel” to that of the bigger one, i.e. the distance between a point on the edge of the inner ellipse and the corresponding point on the outer ellipse is always the same. Then we will divide the difference in the areas of the ellipses, i.e. the area between their edges, by that constant distance. This approaches the circumference as the size of the smaller ellipse approaches the size of the bigger one.

Letting $a, b$ be the axes of the outer ellipse and $ah, bh'$ be the axes of the inner ellipse where $0 < h, h' < 1$, we have $a - ah = b - bh'$. Solving for $h'$, we get $h' = 1 + \frac{a}{b}(h - 1)$. Thus the axes of the inner ellipse are $ah$ and $b(1 + \frac{a}{b}(h - 1)) = b + a(h - 1)$. Since the area of an ellipse is $\pi a b$ for axes $a$ and $b$, we can now write the circumference of the ellipse as a limit:

$$C = \lim_{h \to 1}\frac{\pi a b - \pi(ah)\big(b + a(h - 1)\big)}{a-ah}$$ $$= \pi\lim_{h \to 1}\frac{b - h\big(b + a(h - 1)\big)}{1-h}$$ $$= \pi\lim_{h \to 1}\frac{b(1 - h) + ah(1 - h)}{1-h}$$ $$= \pi\lim_{h \to 1}\frac{b(1 - h) + ah(1 - h)}{1-h}$$ $$= \pi\lim_{h \to 1}\big(b + ah\big)$$ $$ = \pi(a + b)$$ Q.E.D.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Can inner and outer ellipses be parallel though? $\endgroup$
    – Paul
    Dec 1, 2023 at 19:32
  • $\begingroup$ Applying this transformation to the square with sides $x=\pm 1, y=\pm 1$ with $h=1/10$: wolframalpha.com/… $\endgroup$
    – aschepler
    Dec 1, 2023 at 21:16

1 Answer 1


The inner curve "parallel" to the ellipse is not an ellipse. It differs from an ellipse just enough to lead to the wrong circumference when you calculate its area as if it were an ellipse. The difference will be smaller the less eccentric the ellipse.

Your formula is very clearly wrong with high eccentricity, when $a$ is much smaller than $b$. In that case the circumference of the ellipse will be close to $2b$.

  • $\begingroup$ How can I know whether the inner curve is an ellipse or not though? $\endgroup$
    – aether
    Dec 1, 2023 at 20:15
  • $\begingroup$ If it were an ellipse the major and minor axes would be $a-2h$ and $b-2h$. You could check algebraically to see that ellipse is not the parallel curve. There's probably a more geometric way to see the same thing. $\endgroup$ Dec 1, 2023 at 20:33

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .