So I found this question:
If $\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{c_{n+1}}{n \cdot c_n} = a$ then prove that $\lim_{n \to \infty} \sqrt[n+1]{c_{n+1}} - \sqrt[n]{c_n} = \frac{a}{e}$
Now I used the Stolz - Cesaro theorem to prove this by the following method:
Let $a_{n+1} = \sqrt[n+1]{c_{n+1}}$ and $b_{n+1} = n+1$
Thus $\lim_{n \to \infty} \sqrt[n+1]{c_{n+1}} - \sqrt[n]{c_n} = \frac{a_{n+1}-a_n}{b_{n+1}-b_n} = \frac{a_n}{b_n} = \frac{\sqrt[n]{c_n}}{n} = \sqrt[n]{\frac{c_n}{n^n}}$
Let $x_n = \frac{c_n}{n^n}$ then using the converse of the geometric mean case of Stolz - Cesaro theorem $(\lim_{n \to \infty} \sqrt[n]y_n = L \implies \lim_{n \to \infty}\frac{y_{n+1}}{y_n} = L$) we get $\sqrt[n]{\frac{c_n}{n^n}} = \frac {c_{n+1} \cdot n^n}{c_n \cdot (n+1)^{n+1}} = \frac {c_{n+1}}{n \cdot c_n} \cdot \frac{1}{(1 + \frac{1}{n})^{n+1}}$
I don't know if the converse of the multiplicative identity of the Stolz - Cesaro theorem can be used or not but I could not find another way to solve this question. Can you also tell me if the converse of the multiplicative identity of the Stolz - Cesaro theorem exists here?
we know $(1 + \frac{1}{n})^n = (1 + \frac{1}{n})^{n+1} = e\;\&\;(\lim_{n \to \infty} (1+\frac{1}{n}) → 1)$ and it is given that $\frac {c_{n+1}}{n \cdot c_n} = a$
So we get that $\lim_{n \to \infty} \sqrt[n+1]{c_{n+1}} - \sqrt[n]{c_n} = \frac{a}{e}$
Obviously the problem (ignoring the usage of the converse of the multiplicative identity of the Stolz - Cesaro theorem) is we have to prove that $\frac{a_{n+1}-a_n}{b_{n+1}-b_n}$ exists to use Stolz - Cesaro theorem but I cannot find a way to prove how to do it, I just can't get where to start to prove that it exists. It intuitively looks like it should exist.
So my question is : can we prove that it exists and if not, then how would we legitimately solve this question?
P.S. : I saw this question but that solution has a different approach and also my doubt is a little different because I want to use the method stated above. To prove that, we had to prove that $\lim_{n \to \infty} \sqrt[n+1]{c_{n+1}} - \sqrt[n]{c_n}$ exists first which I am not able to do.