I wonder if my approach is completely wrong. If so, may I request for some hints for heading to the right direction? Thank you!

Show that a retract of a contractible space is contractible.

The previous discussion Proof that retract of contractible space is contractible. used the definition that

The identity map on X is null-homotopic, i.e. if it is homotopic to some constant map.

But as to what I found, a space being contractible is simply defined as

A space having the homotopy type of a point is called contractible.

So following this definition, I can only carried out the proof in such a way:

We retract this space $X$ to $A \subset X$. Since $A$ is a subset of $X$, $A$ is also contractible.

So I am wondering, did I miss the definition somewhere? Or I should just use the other definition?

Thank you...

  • $\begingroup$ In general, a subspace of a contractible space is not necessarily contractible (take $S^1\subseteq \mathbb{R}^2$). $\endgroup$ – Aldo Guzmán Sáenz Sep 1 '13 at 4:00
  • $\begingroup$ Yes @AldoGuzmánSáenz, but $\mathbb{R}^2$ can not retract to $S^1$, hence the retract is contractable. Should I follow this to prove..? $\endgroup$ – 1LiterTears Sep 1 '13 at 4:59
  • $\begingroup$ That is why it is important that $A$ is a retract of $X$, not just a subset of $X$. $\endgroup$ – Tunococ Sep 1 '13 at 5:04
  • $\begingroup$ @Jellyfish, yes, you are right, of course. I commented it because you wrote "Since $A$ is a subset of $X$, $A$ is also contractible" (emphasis mine), and I thought that maybe you thought that any subset of a contractible space was contractible, which of course is not true. I see now that this was not the case. $\endgroup$ – Aldo Guzmán Sáenz Sep 1 '13 at 5:19
  • $\begingroup$ Oh yes, I see what you mean @AldoGuzmánSáenz. I see why my proof won't work - so that means I have to use the other definition..? Thank you! $\endgroup$ – 1LiterTears Sep 1 '13 at 5:34

A hint:

You have maps $A \xrightarrow{i} X \xrightarrow{r} A$ such that $ri = id_A$. You are also given the existence of a map $H : X \times I \to X$ such that, for each $x$, $H(x,0) = x$ and $H(x,1) = *$ for some fixed point $* \in X$. You can show that you might as well choose $* \in A$ (think about why -- must $X$ be path connected?)

You need to show the existence of a map $\widetilde{H} : A \times I \to A$ such that $\widetilde{H}(a,0) = a$ and $\widetilde{H}(a,1) = *$ for every $a \in A$. Try to build $\widetilde{H}$ using the maps $H,i$ and $r$.

  • $\begingroup$ So that means I have to use the other definition..? Thank you Thomas! $\endgroup$ – 1LiterTears Sep 1 '13 at 5:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.