4
$\begingroup$

Let $M$ be a compact Riemannian manifold. The fundamental group $\pi_1(M,p_0)$ is isomorphic to the group of deck transformations of the universal cover $\pi:\widetilde{M}\to M$. The translation length of an element $g\in\pi_1(M)$ is defined as $\min_{p\in\widetilde{M}}d(p,g.p)$ . Is it true that the translation length of $g$ equals the shortest length of a loop $\gamma$ in the free homotopy class of loops associated to $g$?

Here's my proof: the translation length of $g$ is realised by a curve $\gamma$ joining points $p$ and $g.p$ by compactness. Projecting $\gamma$ to $M$ we get a closed loop, and there is a path $\alpha$ joining $p_0$ and $\pi(p)$ such that $\alpha*\gamma*\alpha^{-1}$ represent $g$ in $\pi_1(M,p_0)$. So the minimal length in the free homotopy class is clearly less or equal than the translation length. On the other hand, if there was another closed loop $\gamma'$ freely homotopic to a representative of $g$ then it would lift to a curve $\widetilde{\gamma}'$ joining $p'$ to $g.p'$ for some $p'$ so the inequality is true also on the other direction.

Is it correct? I percieve the last passage as a bit sketchy, maybe because it is not clear to me why the curve would join a point with its $g$-traslate.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why do you think your reasoning is wrong? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 19, 2023 at 16:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think that the curve could join to points that are not related by the action of $g$. In fact now that you make me think more thoroughly about it i think that thant might not be the case, but the two points are surely related by the translation by a conjugate of $g$. This is because the $\pi_1(M,p)$ and $\pi_1(M,p')$ are related by an inner automorphism, so i can change the base and lift the path using a point in it as base point. This is enough because the translation length is invariant by conjugation since the deck trasnformation act by isometries. Thank you :) $\endgroup$
    – Dinisaur
    Commented Oct 19, 2023 at 17:04

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

I post this solution originally appeared in the comments as an answer to close the question. Thanks to Moishe Kohan for their socratic help!

The reasoning in the question is also correct, but the curve appearing in the last line could join to points that are not related by the action of $g$, but they are for sure related by the action of a conjugate of $g$. Namely any closed loop $\gamma'$ freely homotopic to a representative of $g$ would lift to a curve $\widetilde{\gamma'}$ joining $p′$ to $\overline{g}.p$, where $\overline{g}=hgh^{-1}$.

This is because the fundamental groups $\pi_1(M,p_0)$ and $\pi_1(M,p'_0)$ are related by an inner automorphism, so we can change the base point to a point $p_0'\in Im(\gamma')$ such that $p'$ projects to $p_0'$, and lift the path $\gamma'$ with respect to this new base point. This is enough because the translation length is invariant by conjugation since the deck trasnformation act by isometries.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .