Assume $M$ is a set, in which all axioms of $ZF - P + (V=L)$ hold. Does then $M$ believe that there exists an uncountable ordinal? I mean, why should the class of all countable ordinal numbers be a set?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That is a great question! $\endgroup$ – Asaf Karagila Sep 16 '10 at 13:12

No. One cannot prove that $\omega_1$ exists in ZF - P, with or without V = L.

The set $HC$ of hereditarily countable sets always satisfies ZF - P. (This is straightforward to check axiom per axiom.) Of course, $\omega_1 \notin HC$ but moreover every set in $HC$ is countable or finite as witnessed by a function in $HC$. Therefore, $HC$ knows that every set in $HC$ is countable and hence $HC$ is a model of ZF - P + "every set is at most countable."

Throwing in V = L into the mix doesn't help. Indeed, $HC^L = L_{\omega_1^L}$ (see my answer to your recent MO question for a proof) is a model of ZF - P + V = L + "every set is at most countable."

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you :). I should have remembered these models! $\endgroup$ – Martin Brandenburg Sep 16 '10 at 14:04
  • $\begingroup$ çois: I'm wondering about a possible generalization of this idea. Can you take every regular ordinal and create a model of ZF[C]-P such that every set is smaller that the given ordinal? $\endgroup$ – Asaf Karagila Sep 16 '10 at 15:32
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Yes, Asaf. If $\kappa > \omega$ is regular then $H(\kappa)$, the family of sets whose transitive closure has size less than $\kappa$, is a model of ZFC-P in which all sets have size at most $\kappa$. (Regularity is needed for the replacement axiom to hold.) $\endgroup$ – François G. Dorais Sep 16 '10 at 16:18
  • $\begingroup$ I only knew it was true for $H(\omega)$ for ZF-Inf. $\endgroup$ – Asaf Karagila Sep 16 '10 at 19:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.