2
$\begingroup$

If we have an embedding $f:X \rightarrow A$, where $A \subset Y$, do we have to show $f^{-1}$ is continuous?

I'm looking at a proof where they only show that $f$ is continuous and 1-1. Then I looked at the Wikipedia article on embeddings,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embedding

"In general topology, an embedding is a one-to-one function (i.e., an injection) that is a homeomorphism onto its image.[1] More explicitly, an injective continuous map f : X → Y between topological spaces X and Y is a topological embedding if f yields a homeomorphism between X and f(X) (where f(X) carries the subspace topology inherited from Y). Intuitively then, the embedding f : X → Y lets us treat X as a subspace of Y. Every embedding is injective and continuous. Every map that is injective, continuous and either open or closed is an embedding; however there are also embeddings which are neither open nor closed. The latter happens if the image f(X) is neither an open set nor a closed set in Y."

I'm confused. Is there a difference, in topology, between an embedding and a topological embedding? Are there some cases where I don't have to show that $f^{-1}$ is continuous?

EDIT: $X,Y$ are compact metric spaces.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ In the proof at which you’re looking, what else is known about $X$? If, for instance, $X$ is compact, it’s enough to show that $f$ is continuous and $1$-$1$. $\endgroup$ – Brian M. Scott Aug 23 '13 at 23:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @BrianM.Scott: ... and $Y$ or $A$ are Hausdorff, ... $\endgroup$ – Stefan Hamcke Aug 23 '13 at 23:42
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, $X,Y$ are compact. I was thinking about that,...what does that do? $\endgroup$ – user41728 Aug 23 '13 at 23:42
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Every continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism (should be in any standard intro to topology course/textbook). here's a proof $\endgroup$ – Dan Rust Aug 23 '13 at 23:44
  • $\begingroup$ @DanielRust: You are right, I found it. I didn't expect this. Thanks. $\endgroup$ – user41728 Aug 23 '13 at 23:47
4
$\begingroup$

If, as in this case, $X$ is compact and $A$ is Hausdorff, it suffices to show that $f:X\to A$ is a continuous bijection. To see this, let $F$ be a closed set in $X$. Then $F$ is compact, and $f$ is continuous, so $f[F]$ is compact in $A$ and therefore closed in $A$, since compact sets in a Hausdorff space are closed. Thus, $f$ is a closed map. Now let $U$ be any open set in $X$; then $X\setminus U$ is closed, and $f[U]=A\setminus f[X\setminus U]$ is open, since $f$ is a bijection, and $f^{-1}$ is therefore continuous.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Why do you conclude from this that $f^{-1}$ is continuous? $\endgroup$ – IntegrateThis Nov 27 '18 at 1:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.