1
$\begingroup$

let $\Omega$ an open bounded and regular in $\mathbb{R}^n$, and let $\overline{\Omega}_1$ and $\overline{\Omega}_2$ and partition to $\Omega:$ $\Omega = \overline{\Omega_1} \cup \overline{\Omega_2}.$ We put $\Gamma=\partial \Omega_1 \cap \partial \Omega_2$ the interface between $\Omega_1$ and $\Omega_2$ ($\Gamma \subset \Omega$), and we put $u_i=u/\Omega_i$ Let the problem: $$ \begin{cases} &-k_i\Delta u_i=f,x\in \Omega_i, i=1,2\\ &u_i=0, x\in \partial \Omega\\ & u_1=u_2, x \in \Gamma\\ &k_1 \nabla u_1 \cdot n = k_2 \nabla u_2 \cdot n, x \in \Gamma \end{cases} $$ where $k_i$ is an constant piecewise function , $i=1,2,$ $k(x)=k_i>0$ and $f\in L^2(\Omega).$

I found that, the variatioanal formulation of this problem is: found $u\in H^1_0(\Omega)$ such that $$\int_{\Omega} k\nabla u \cdot \nabla v dx = \int_{\Omega} fvdx,\quad \forall v \in H^1_0(\Omega)$$ My question is: how we prouve that the solution of this variational formulation, is the solution of the problem?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ any one can help me please $\endgroup$ – jijii Aug 22 '13 at 9:06
  • $\begingroup$ I already helped you a few days ago and you didn't even bother commenting, thanking, accepting or upvoting, but anyway, you have a starting point below as an answer. $\endgroup$ – Miguel Aug 25 '13 at 8:28
  • $\begingroup$ Also: first check that your weak formulation is correct, it looks a bit suspicious to me. $\endgroup$ – Miguel Aug 25 '13 at 8:30
1
$\begingroup$

Once you are sure your weak formulation is right, suppose your weak solution is regular enough that you can integrate by parts, then do it and choose your test functions $v$ in spaces of smooth functions. You'll probably need to do this several times, once for each boundary condition.

For example you may first try with functions such that $supp (v) \subset \Gamma$. See what cancels out in the integral equation and you'll get some equality of integrals for every $v$ in this space. Because of the choice of space for the test functions, this will imply one of the boundary conditions. And so on. Note that you might have to do some manipulations using what you just found out in previous steps.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.