In block notation, the matrix $\begin{pmatrix} 1&2&3&4 \\ 5&6&7&8 \\ a&b&c&d \\ e&f&g&h\end{pmatrix}$ can be writen as $\begin{pmatrix} A_1& A_2 \\ A_3&A_4\end{pmatrix}$ where $A_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 1&2 \\ 5&6\end{pmatrix}$, $A_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 3&4 \\7&8\end{pmatrix}$, ....
I would like to write this matrix $\begin{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} 1&2 \\ 5&6 \end{pmatrix}&\begin{pmatrix} 3&4 \\ 5&6 \end{pmatrix}\\\begin{pmatrix} a&b \\ e&f \end{pmatrix}&\begin{pmatrix} c&d\\ g&h\end{pmatrix}\end{pmatrix}$ as $\begin{pmatrix} A_1& A_2 \\ A_3&A_4\end{pmatrix}$, but this looks like block notation. How do you handle this ambiguity?
The approach I think I will take is that block notation will allways be indicated by lines $\left( \begin{array}{c|c} A_1& A_2 \\\hline A_3&A_4\end{array} \right)$.
If the notation at the top is called block notation, what do you call the other notation? It is similar to a tensor product, but I don't think it actually is.