I'm having trouble with this exercise from Bain and Engelhardt's textbook:

Consider independent random samples of size $n_1$ and $n_2$ from respective exponential distributions $X_i \sim EXP(\theta_1)$ and $Y_i \sim EXP(\theta_2)$. Derive the Generalize Likelihood Ratio test of $H_0:\theta_1=\theta_2$ versus $H_1:\theta_1\neq\theta_2$.

The Generalized Likelihood Ratio is defined by


where $\hat{\vec{\theta}}$ denotes the usual Maximum Likelihood Estimator of $\vec{\theta}$ and $\hat{\vec{\theta_0}}$ denotes the MLE under the restriction that $H_0$ is true.

One is then supposed to apply the Neyman-Pearson lemma.

I've thought about this exercise for some time now, unsuccesfully.

Thank you for any help given.


When $\theta_1 \neq \theta_2$, the likelihood is (given the independence assumption) $\mathcal{L}(\theta_1,\theta_2)=\theta_1 ^ {n_1} \exp [-\theta_1 (x_1 + \dots + x_{n_1})] \theta_2 ^ {n_2} \exp [-\theta_2 (y_1 + \dots + y_{n_2})]$.

When $\theta = \theta_1 = \theta_2$, the likelihood is \begin{align} \mathcal{L}(\theta)&=\theta ^ {n_1} \exp [-\theta (x_1 + \dots + x_{n_1})] \theta ^ {n_2} \exp [-\theta (y_1 + \dots + y_{n_2})] \\ &= \theta^{n_1+n_2} \exp [ -\theta ( x_1 + \dots + x_{n_1} + y_1 + \dots + y_{n_2} )] \end{align}

I leave the rest to you.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.