3
$\begingroup$

Let $T:\mathcal{D}(T)\subset X\to Y$ be a densely defined closable operator. Define $\text{ker}\,T=\{(x,0)\in \text{graph}\,T\}$ where $\text{graph}\,T\subset X\times Y$. My question is

$\overline{\text{ker}\,T}=\text{ker}\,\overline{T}$?

I recall that $\overline{T}$ is the closure of $T$.

I know that $\overline{\text{ker}\,T}\subset\text{ker}\,\overline{T}$, what about the reverse inclusion? So far I have proved that $\text{ker}\,T^{\perp}\subset R(T^*)$ implies the inclusion $\overline{\text{ker}\,T}\supset\text{ker}\,\overline{T}$, but this inclusion seems to be false in general.

Someone has any clue about the kernel of the closure of an operator? Thanks in advance.

Remarks: $M^{\perp}=\{x'\in X'\mid x'(x)=0 \text{ for every } x\in M\}$ where $X'$ is the dual space and $T^*:\mathcal{D}(T^*)\subset Y'\to X'$ is the adjoint. The norm in $X\times Y$ is $||(x,y)||=||x||+||y||$.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

This is not true even for bounded operators. Let $H=l^2(\mathbb N),\ \{e_k,\ k\in\mathbb N\}$ be the standard base. Define $$A((x_1,x_2,x_3,\dots))=(0,x_2,x_3,\dots),$$ and $$D(A)=lin\{f_1,e_2,e_3,\dots\},$$ where $f_1=(1,\frac 1 2,\frac 1 3,\dots).$ Then $A$ is densely defined, $e_1\notin D(A),$ hence $\overline{\ker A}=\ker A=\{0\}$ but $\ker\overline A=\mathbb R e_1.$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.