Cones on surfaces I found this question in one of the exams given for a topology course and I couldn't get anything out of it; it just seemed overwhelming as a question, but maybe I'm missing something.
Let us define the cone on any topological space $Y$ as $c(Y) = Y \times [0,1]$ where $Y \times \{0\}$ is shrunk to one point. Prove that for any compact, connected surface without boundary with Euler characteristic less than $1$ its cone is not homeomorphic to $c(S^2)$.
The only thing I could do with it was to get it down to this (which is the same thing only with the characteristic requirement made explicit): $\forall n > 1$ $c(U_n)$ is not homeomorphic to $c(S^2)$ and $\forall n \geq 1$ $c(V_n)$ is not homeomorphic to $c(S^2)$. Where $U_n$ and $V_n$ are respectively standard non-orientable and orientable surfaces.
Actually, something I just came up with is that they can't be homeomorphic because $S^2$ is not homeomorphic to any of those surfaces, thus every fiber of those cones isn't homeomorphic to any fiber of the cone on $S^2$; but I don't think that's enough, am I right?
EDIT: the bounty is both for an answer which is different from mine, since I think there might be a "easier" approach to the question, and for an answer that might explain what (if there is) is wrong with my own approach.
 A: Thanks to Ryan's comment I was able to do the following, I would appreciate it if anyone pointed out any mistakes or gaps in this proof:
let $\pi(Y): (Y\times [0,1]) \to c(Y)$ the quotient projection; if we remove the point $Y\times \{0\}$ (which we'll call the vertex $v$ of the cone), we have that $c(Y)\setminus \{v\}$ is homeomorphic to $Y \times (0,1]$, since $\pi$ is an open bijection.
$Y \times (0,1]$ retracts on $Y \times \{1\}$ (this is actually a deformation retract), since $F((y,t),s) = (y,1-s+ts)$ is a deformation. Moreover, we have that $Y \times \{1\}$ is homeomorphic to $Y$. Thus we have that $c(Y) \setminus v$ is homotopy equivalent to $Y$, so also the Euler characteristic of the cone minus the vertex is at most 1.
Let's suppose that $c(Y)$ and $c(S^2)$ are homeomorphic and let $g$ be that homeomophism; we also have that $c(Y) \setminus v$ is homeomorphic to $c(S^2)\setminus f(v)$. But $c(S^2) \cong D^3$ ($\cong$ means "is homeomorphic to"), because $g: c(S^2) \to D^2$ such that $g(x,t) = tx$ with $t \in [0,1]$ and $x \in S^2$ is constant on the fibers of the quotient projection, which means that there exists $h: c(S^2) \to D^3$ which is continuous. This is also a bijection and sinche $c(S^2)$ is compact and $D^3$ is T2, $h$ is an homoeomorphism.
At this point we have that $c(Y) \setminus v \cong D^3 \setminus h(g(v))$. If we remove a point from $D^3$, on the other hand, we get that it retracts on its border sphere, which has characteristic $2$, which is absurd.
The case that $h(g(v))$ is on the border of $D^3$ can't present, since there exists a retraction $r: c(Y) \setminus v \to Y \times 1$, which implies the existence of the retraction $hgrg^{-1}h^{-1}: D^3 \setminus h(g(v)) \to h(g(Y \times 1))$, but $h(g(Y \times 1)) \cong Y$, which has non-trivial fundamental group; this is absurd, since the inclusion would induce an injective homomorphism between a trivial group and a non-trivial one ($D^3$ minus a point is contractible). 
This concludes the proof.
