0
$\begingroup$

Can you explain me a little how to think of the relation with (1) and the permutaion language

$$\begin{align*}\left(\begin{array}{c} n\\ k_1,k_2,\text{...},k_n \end{array}\right)=\frac{n!}{k_1!k_2!\text{...}k_m!}\tag{1}\end{align*}$$

statement1:

In permutaion language, (1) is the permutation number of $n$ elements that partitioned into $k$ tuples, in each tuples they are the same, but different with each other in different tuples. The number of elements in each tuples is $,n_1,n_2,\text{...},n_k$($n_1+n_2+\text{...}+n_k=n$).

In the special case, Binomial Theorem

$(a+b)^n=(a+b)(a+b)\text{...}(a+b)$, I know it's choosing k's $a$ from n tuples $(a+b)$(think it is a box, but according to the statement1, there are $a$ and $b$ in one box, so the box is not the same as that in statement1(the tuples))

$\left(\begin{array}{c} n\\ k \end{array}\right)a^kb^{n-k}$

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Do you mean the relationship between these and the multinomial theorem that gives the expansion of $(x_1+x_2+\cdots+x_m)^n$? Or do you mean why the thing on the right of (1) counts the permutations? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 11, 2013 at 5:09
  • $\begingroup$ @AndréNicolas yes, the relation between statement1 and the expansion of ... , your first judgement. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 11, 2013 at 5:37
  • $\begingroup$ Think of expanding. The coefficient of $x_1^{k_1}\cdots x_m^{k_m}$ is just the number of ways of choosing which ones of the $n$ terms will supply the $k_1$ $x_1$'s, which ones will supply the $k_2$ $x_2$'s, and so on. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 11, 2013 at 5:46

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

My comment was badly worded. Here's the correct version.

In permutation language, $\binom{n}{k_1,k_2,\ldots,k_\ell}$ is the number of ways of arranging $n$ letters, with $k_1$ copies of letter $1,$ $k_2$ copies of letter $2$, $k_3$ copies of letter $3,$ and so on. For example, ABABC is one of the $\binom{5}{2,2,1}=\frac{5!}{2!\,2!\,1!}=30$ ways to arrange two As, two Bs, and one C.

There are two ways to think about this:

  1. Arrange $n$ letters in $n!$ ways. Then, since permutations of repeated letters amongst themselves do not change the arrangement, divide by the number of such permutations.
  2. An arrangement can be formed by regarding the letters as being placed into $n$ slots. Choose which $k_1$ of the $n$ slots are to contain letter $1$; then choose which $k_2$ of the $n-k_1$ remaining slots are to contain letter $2$; then choose which $k_3$ of the $n-k_1-k_2$ remaining slots are to contain letter $3$; and so on. There are $\binom{n}{k_1}\binom{n-k_1}{k_2}\binom{n-k_1-k_2}{k_3}\ldots$ ways to do this.

If you write out the binomial coefficients appearing in Method 2, you will find that the product telescopes (i.e. there is a systematic cancelation between one factor and the next), leaving the same result as Method 1.

Addendum in response to query in the comments:
A telescoping sum is one where there is cancelation between one term and the next, leading to a big simplification. They come up often in the study of sequences. An example would be $$\begin{aligned}\sum_{i=1}^5\frac{1}{i(i+1)}&=\sum_{i=1}^5\left[\frac{1}{i}-\frac{1}{i+1}\right]\\ &=(1/1-1/2)+(1/2-1/3)+(1/3-1/4)+(1/4-1/5)+(1/5-1/6)\\ &=1/1+(-1/2+1/2)+(-1/3+1/3)+(-1/4+1/4)+(-1/5+1/5)-1/6\\ &=1/1-1/6.\end{aligned} $$ One can also have telescoping products. Let's actually try writing this one out: $$ \begin{aligned}&\binom{n}{k_1}\binom{n-k_1}{k_2}\binom{n-k_1-k_2}{k_3}\ldots\binom{n-k_1-\ldots-k_{\ell-1}}{k_\ell}\\ &\quad=\frac{n!}{k_1!\,(n-k_1)!}\frac{(n-k_1)!}{k_2!\,(n-k_1-k_2)!}\frac{(n-k_1-k_2)!}{k_3!\,(n-k_1-k_2-k_3)!}\ldots\frac{(n-k_1-\ldots-k_{\ell-1})!}{k_\ell!\,(n-k_1-\ldots-k_\ell)!}\\ &\quad=\frac{1}{k_1!\,k_2!\,\ldots\,k_\ell!}\cdot\frac{n!}{(n-k_1)!}\frac{(n-k_1)!}{(n-k_1-k_2)!}\frac{(n-k_1-k_2)!}{(n-k_1-k_2-k_3)!}\ldots\frac{(n-k_1-\ldots-k_{\ell-1})!}{(n-k_1-\ldots-k_\ell)!}\\ &\quad=\frac{1}{k_1!\,k_2!\,\ldots\,k_\ell!}\cdot\frac{n!}{(n-k_1-\ldots-k_\ell)!}\\ &\quad=\frac{1}{k_1!\,k_2!\,\ldots\,k_\ell!}\cdot\frac{n!}{0!}.\end{aligned} $$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Well,,,your answer is good, can you explain me a little about the terminology "product telescopes",,, I'm not so familiar with... $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 11, 2013 at 14:54
  • $\begingroup$ @HyperGroups : Since my response was too long for a comment, I've ammended my answer above. Hope that helps. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 11, 2013 at 16:01

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .