2
$\begingroup$

Let $p$ be an odd prime, and let $T$ be the Tate module of an elliptic curve defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, or the representation attached to a modular form or to a Hida family of modular forms. Why is it true that the $\pm 1$-eigenspaces of the residual representation of $T$ under the action of the complex conjugation are both $1$-dimensional? Why couldn't they be $0$ and $2$ dimensional, or vice-versa?

More precisely:

  1. Let $E$ be an elliptic curve defined over $\mathbb{Q}$ and let $E[p]$ be the subgroup of $E$ consisting of $p$-torsion points, which is isomorphic to $(\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z})^2$. Then for example in [Gross, Kolyvagin's work on modular elliptic curves, Section 3] it is written that the $\pm 1$-eigenspaces for the action of the complex conjugation on $E[p]$ are both 1-dimensional over $\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}$.

  2. Let $V_f$ be a 2-dimensional $p$-adic representation attached to a normalized cusp form. Here for example [Nekovar, Kolyvagin's method for Chow groups of Kuga-Sato varieties, Chapter 10] suggests that the $\pm 1$-eigenspaces for the action of the complex conjugation on some finite quotients of $V_f$ are both 1-dimensional.

  3. If $\mathbb{T}$ is the Galois representation attached to a Hida family of modular forms, [Nekovar-Plater, On the parity of ranks of Selmer groups, (1.5.3)] tells that the $\pm 1$-eigenspaces for the action of the complex conjugation on the residual representation attached to $\mathbb{T}$ are both 1-dimensional.

$\endgroup$
0

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

From the complex torus side $E[p^\infty]$ is dense in $E(\Bbb{C})$ and so the complex conjugaison $\rho$ doesn't act as $+1$ or $-1$ on the whole of $E[p^\infty]$.

So for $k$ large enough $(\rho+1)E[p^k]$ and $(\rho-1)E[p^k]$ will contain some non-$O$ elements $P,Q$.

As $(\rho-1)(\rho+1)E[p^k]=O$ it gives $(\rho-1)P=O,(\rho+1)Q=O$.

Multiplying $P,Q$ by suitable powers of $p$ it will give two points of order $p$ onto which $\rho$ acts as $+1$ and $-1$ and so $\rho \in End(E[p])$ has the two 1-dimensional eigenspaces.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Could you explain why $\rho$ is diagonalizable as an endomorphism of $E[p^k]$? I have some issues with linear algebra over commutative rings $\endgroup$
    – Fraz
    Commented Feb 22, 2023 at 9:19
  • $\begingroup$ @Fraz $E[p^k] =2E[p^k]= (\rho+1)E[p^k]+(\rho-1)E[p^k]$. The $+$ is a direct sum $\oplus$ because if $R\in (\rho+1)E[p^k]\cap (\rho-1)E[p^k]$ then $(\rho-1) R = (\rho+1)R=O$ so $2R=O,R=O$. $\endgroup$
    – reuns
    Commented Feb 22, 2023 at 11:09
2
$\begingroup$

reuns’s answer is very good, but here’s another, perhaps more arithmetic argument.

First for elliptic curves:

Let $c$ denote the complex conjugation. I claim that $\det(c\mid T)=-1$: this proves the claim, since $c^2=\mathrm{id}$.

To do that, it is enough to show that for every $n \geq 1$, $\det(c \mid E[p^n])=-1$.

But it's well known that we have the Galois-equivariant bilinear perfect Weil pairing $W: E[p^n] \times E[p^n] \rightarrow \mu_{p^n}$, such that $W(x,x)=1$. If $P,Q$ are any points in $E[p^n]$, then $W(P,Q)^{-1}=c(W(P,Q))=W(cP,cQ)=W(P,Q)^{\det(c\mid E[p^n])}$, which concludes.

This idea extends (somewhat) to representations attached to modular forms (and hence to Hida families).

Let’s take a newform $f \in \mathcal{S}_k(\Gamma_1(N))$ of nebentypus $\chi$. Then our $p$-adic representation $V_f$ is such that the characteristic polynomial of the Frobenius $F_{\ell}$ at a prime $\ell \not\mid pN$ is $X^2-a_{\ell}X+\ell^{k-1}\chi(\ell)$.

In particular, let $\psi$ be the determinant of $V_f$. Then, at every $F_{\ell}$ as above, $\psi$ agrees with $\omega_p^{k-1}\chi(\alpha_N)$, where $\omega_p$ is the $p$-adic cyclotomic character and $\alpha_N$ the mod $N$-cyclotomic character.

Now, $\psi$ and $\omega_p^{k-1}\chi(\alpha_N)$ are continuous characters: therefore, by Cebotarev, they’re equal. So $\det(c\mid T)=\omega_p^{k-1}(c)\chi(\alpha_N(c))=(-1)^{k-1}\chi(-1)=-1$ and we’re done.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ This is what I was looking for, thankyou! Just for the sake of completeness, I point out that in [Howard, Variation of Heegner points in Hida families, Equation (3)] he finds a pairing for the (twisted) representation attached to a Hida family of modular forms that does the same job as the Weil pairing does for elliptic curves. $\endgroup$
    – Fraz
    Commented Feb 23, 2023 at 9:19
  • $\begingroup$ I like this argument too, but I’m in fact not sure that it’s not somehow circular… because we need to show that the Hecke polynomial is in fact the characteristic polynomial of the representation, and not just a family of vanishing polynomials. And I’m not completely sure that there’s a way to do this without involving the complex conjugation at all… $\endgroup$
    – Aphelli
    Commented Feb 23, 2023 at 11:28
  • $\begingroup$ Yes it is possible for this argument to be circular, I just wanted to remark that also in the Hida family case one can build a pairing that behaves like the Weil pairing and gives a way to (at least) see the action of complex conjugation. Anyway, your almost-elementary argument about modular forms easily implies the same result for Hida families, just taking specializations. $\endgroup$
    – Fraz
    Commented Feb 23, 2023 at 16:29

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .