Let $p$ be an odd prime, and let $T$ be the Tate module of an elliptic curve defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, or the representation attached to a modular form or to a Hida family of modular forms. Why is it true that the $\pm 1$-eigenspaces of the residual representation of $T$ under the action of the complex conjugation are both $1$-dimensional? Why couldn't they be $0$ and $2$ dimensional, or vice-versa?
More precisely:
Let $E$ be an elliptic curve defined over $\mathbb{Q}$ and let $E[p]$ be the subgroup of $E$ consisting of $p$-torsion points, which is isomorphic to $(\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z})^2$. Then for example in [Gross, Kolyvagin's work on modular elliptic curves, Section 3] it is written that the $\pm 1$-eigenspaces for the action of the complex conjugation on $E[p]$ are both 1-dimensional over $\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}$.
Let $V_f$ be a 2-dimensional $p$-adic representation attached to a normalized cusp form. Here for example [Nekovar, Kolyvagin's method for Chow groups of Kuga-Sato varieties, Chapter 10] suggests that the $\pm 1$-eigenspaces for the action of the complex conjugation on some finite quotients of $V_f$ are both 1-dimensional.
If $\mathbb{T}$ is the Galois representation attached to a Hida family of modular forms, [Nekovar-Plater, On the parity of ranks of Selmer groups, (1.5.3)] tells that the $\pm 1$-eigenspaces for the action of the complex conjugation on the residual representation attached to $\mathbb{T}$ are both 1-dimensional.