1
$\begingroup$

Wikipedia says a volume form on a differentiable manifold is a nowhere-vanishing top-dimensionial form.

And Guillemin and Pollack says $f: V \to U$ is a diffeomorphim of two open sets in $\mathbb{R}^k$ and $\omega = dx_1 \wedge \cdots \wedge dx_k$ is the volume form.

So, can I understand volume form as the top-dimensional form with coefficient $1$?

And as an exapmple, if $\omega$ is the volume form on $T^2$, then $\int_{T^2} \omega = \operatorname{vol}(T^2)?$

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It doesn't make sense to talk about "the top-dimensional form with coefficient 1." There isn't a canonical choice of top-dimensional form for most manifolds. (I think. It has been a while since I learned this stuff.) $\endgroup$ – Potato Aug 8 '13 at 22:56
  • $\begingroup$ 40 votes? @Potato $\endgroup$ – WishingFish Aug 8 '13 at 22:59
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ What? $\textbf{}$ $\endgroup$ – Potato Aug 8 '13 at 22:59
  • $\begingroup$ Oh~ There is a user named 40 votes.... $\endgroup$ – WishingFish Aug 8 '13 at 23:03
6
$\begingroup$

The space of top forms is the space of sections of a real vector bundle of dimension 1 over your manifold. A volume form is a non-vanishing section of this bundle. So as Potato says, if there is one volume form (I.e. if your manifold is orientable), then there are many. You can, however, distinguish a unique volume form if your manifold is oriented and Riemannian: You then require the form to take the value 1 on oriented orthonormal bases at each point.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So you mean top forms can't have coefficients, except for $\pm 1$ as orientation? But I've seen expressions like $4 \, dx_1 \wedge dx_2.$ $\endgroup$ – WishingFish Aug 9 '13 at 4:47
  • $\begingroup$ You can multiply volume forms by nonzero real numbers and still get a volume form. The point is: without a metric and an orientation there is no natural choice for the form to the right of the coefficient. $\endgroup$ – Tim kinsella Aug 9 '13 at 4:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Lee's "introduction to smooth manifolds" is the best reference for this, IMO. $\endgroup$ – Tim kinsella Aug 9 '13 at 4:52
  • $\begingroup$ When you write "$dx^1dx^2$" you probably have in mind $\mathbb{R}^2$ on which there is a natural Riemannian metric and orientation making that form the unique volume form with the property I mention in my answer $\endgroup$ – Tim kinsella Aug 9 '13 at 4:56
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you Tim, now I understand. :) $\endgroup$ – WishingFish Aug 9 '13 at 5:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.