7
$\begingroup$

If $K$ is an imaginary quadratic field and $M$ is an unramified Abelian extension of $K$, the prove that $M$ is Galois over $\mathbb{Q}$

Let see... If $L$ is the Hilbert class field of $K$, then $L$ is the maximal extension unramified of $K$, then $\mathbb{Q} \subset K \subset M \subset L$ and $L$ is Galois over $K$...

Thanks!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ See the answer by Hurkyl, where he stated a general theorem that the Hilbert class field of $\mathbb Q(\sqrt m)$ is formed by adjoining square roots of factors of $m$, hence galois over $\mathbb Q$. Then, $M$ being a sub-field of $L$, we might be able to prove some assertions about the forms of $M$, hence obtaining the galoisity of $M/\mathbb Q$. Hope this helps. $\endgroup$ – awllower Aug 8 '13 at 9:50
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @awllower: Dear awllower, This description of the HCF is not correct. (See the comment I added to Hurkyl's answer.) Regards, $\endgroup$ – Matt E Aug 26 '13 at 2:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Dear P.M.O., As I commented on another question of yours related to class field theory, it would help to have a little more context and background on where you are coming from, so as to know what would constitute a satisfactory answer. Regards, $\endgroup$ – Matt E Aug 26 '13 at 2:48
  • $\begingroup$ @MattE I have partially answered the question..I hope to go for right direction. $\endgroup$ – P. M. O. Aug 30 '13 at 3:45
  • $\begingroup$ Dear P.M.O., As I said before, it would help to know a bit more about your background and where this question is coming from. (Are you reading a book on class field theory that this problem came from. Which one? What do you know about class field theory so far?) Regards, $\endgroup$ – Matt E Aug 30 '13 at 11:07
0
$\begingroup$

Partial answer:

We have $K \subset L$, $M \subset L$ and $\mathbb{Q} \subset K$, Galois extensions. Also, $K \subset M$ Galois, because $Gal(L/M)$ is normal subgroup of $Gal(L/K)$.

What can we say about $Aut(M/\mathbb{Q})$?

$|Aut(M/\mathbb{Q})|= 2|Gal(M/K)|$?

$\endgroup$
-1
$\begingroup$

The following simple argument seems to work for any $K$ that is Galois over $\mathbb{Q}$ (could it be that $K$ is specified to be imaginary quadratic in order to ensure one understands that $M/K$ is unramified not only at the finite but also at the infinite primes?): since $M$ is unramified, abelian, it must be contained in $CF(K)$. As $CF(K)/K$ is Galois and abelian, all the intermediate fields must be Galois and abelian. So $M/K$ is Galois. Since $K/\mathbb{Q}$ is also Galois, $M/\mathbb{Q}$ must be Galois as well.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Actually, almost everything is said in P.M.O.'s answer. The only thing I should have added is that a Galois extension of a Galois extension is again Galois. $\endgroup$ – streetcar277 Feb 7 '14 at 15:27
  • $\begingroup$ Galois extensions of Galois extensions need not be Galois: consider ${\mathbb Q}(\sqrt[4]{2})$ $\endgroup$ – franz lemmermeyer Mar 15 '16 at 17:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.