1
$\begingroup$

I'm reading a book about geometry, and after thinking and viewing the Möbius strip, I want to know whether the book is right or not.

The book says with a little description (that I can't write here despite of my little english...) that the Möbius strip is given by

$f(u) + v g(u), \{v, -1, 1\}, \{u, 0, 2 \pi \}$

where

$f(u) = \{2 sin (u), 2 cos(u), 0\}$

$g(u) = \{0, sin(u/2), cos(u/2)\}$

(You can see that $g(u)$ is always parallel to plane ${X=0}$).

You can see the shape in this file I programmed in Mathematica

but

when I try to view in my head the Möbius strip with the description of a piece of paper or any other material... I view any similar to this

$f(u) + v g(u), \{v, -1, 1\}, \{u, 0, 2 \pi \}$

where

$f(u) = \{2 sin(u), 2 cos(u), 0\}$

$g(u) = \{sin(u/2)cos(u/2), sin(u/2)sin(u/2), cos(u/2)\}$

You can see the shape in this file I programmed in Mathematica

To view the cdf files, you need the CDF Player http://www.wolfram.com/cdf-player/

or in a easy way vieweing this image

I´m interested on this question considering the strip as a figure.

Thank you very much.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Please see here for a guide to writing math with MathJax, and see here for a guide to formatting posts with Markdown. $\endgroup$ – Zev Chonoles Aug 6 '13 at 19:11
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The Möbius strip is a topological space. It has no single representation in representation in space. Consider the concept of "simple loop." There are lots of simple loops in the plane - the circle is only the most obvious. $\endgroup$ – Thomas Andrews Aug 6 '13 at 19:30
  • $\begingroup$ The book only described one particular Mobius strip. There are many others. $\endgroup$ – littleO Nov 30 '14 at 10:50
2
$\begingroup$

When discussing topological spaces we are usually only interested in them up to homeomorphism (bijections that are continuous in both directions). "Mild" deformations can be ignored. The two subsets of $\mathbb R^3$ that you describe are homeomorphic, which is best seen by the fact that they both are homeomorphic (via the $(u,v)\mapsto f(u)+vg(u)$) to the topological space $[-1,1]\times[0,2\pi]$ where the points $(x,0)$ and $(-x,2\pi)$ are identified.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Yes @hagen-von-eitzen but I´m in a differential geometry course,... so my question is not from a topological point of view. I´m more interested in the question from a "differential geometry" point of view. $\endgroup$ – Mika Ike Aug 6 '13 at 19:43
  • $\begingroup$ I´m interested in the Moebious Strip as a figure. $\endgroup$ – Mika Ike Aug 6 '13 at 19:46
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @MikaIke: Replace "up to homeomorphism" with "up to diffeomorphism" in Hagen's answer. $\endgroup$ – Cheerful Parsnip Aug 6 '13 at 21:48
0
$\begingroup$

I try to answer your question as best as I can " considering the strip as a figure" in your query, looking at the Band as internally inflexible unlike any flexible rubbery surface.

RotatingLineChristianBlatter

In the explanation he gives how $v$ vector second part g(u) of rotating stick (relative spherical vector rotation, my addition) motion is added around a fixed director circular ring described by first part f(u) when generating the Moebius strip.( Read $ a=2, \phi=u, t=v $)

$$M:\quad(\phi,t)\mapsto(a\cos\phi,a\sin\phi,0)+ t\left(\sin{\phi\over2}\cos\phi,\ \sin{\phi\over2}\sin\phi,\ \cos{\phi\over2}\right)$$ with $0\leq\phi\leq 2\pi$, $\>-b\leq t\leq b$.

$$M: \left(( a+t \sin{\phi\over2})\cos\phi,(a+t\ \sin{\phi\over2})\sin\phi,t\ \cos{\phi\over2}\right) $$ with $0\leq\phi\leq 2\pi$, $\>-b\leq t\leq b$.

$f(u) = \{2 sin (u), 2 cos(u), 0\}; g(u) = \{0, sin(u/2), cos(u/2)\}$

$f(u) = \{2 sin(u), 2 cos(u), 0\}; g(u) = \{sin(u/2)cos(u/2), sin(u/2)sin(u/2), cos(u/2)\}$

The first g(u) is a unit magnitude vector in cylindrical coordinates with half argument u/2.

The second g(u) is a unit magnitude vector in spherical coordinates with half argument u/2.

They should essentially be modified with half arguments to induce non-orientabilty.

The first cylindrical modification perhaps the simplest ( may be most quoted) parametrization, the rest move the vector forward and backwards resulting in a fold that you can see in Mathematica 3D plots.

In topological consideration either of the above two is viewed same because the rubber membrane can stretch and, upto homeo/diffeomorphism they are topologically the same.

It appears that there are several parametrizations, because topologically it perhaps "needs no standard parametrization".

Conserved invariants like Euler characteristic $\chi$ and genus $g$ are invariants associated with second fundamental form. ( Not fully sure, I have yet to verify this .)

However, if you are looking to local quantities that are conserved by isometry like Gauss curvature $K$, geodesic curvature $k_g$ etc.(scalar quantities dependent on first fundamental form of surface theory) they are different after homeomorphism.

The Gauss-Bonnet theorem brings these together in an elegant way, as stated by KF Gauss.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.