Take as your induction hypothesis the statement that if $M$ is a non-negative integer less than $N$, and $\ell$ is any positive integer, then there is a unique decomposition
$$M=\binom{x_\ell}\ell+\binom{x_{\ell-1}}{\ell-1}+\ldots+\binom{x_1}1$$
with $0\le x_1<x_2<\ldots<x_\ell$.
There is certainly a unique non-negative integer $x$ such that $\binom{x}k\le N<\binom{x+1}k$. The first thing to verify is that it’s the only possible choice for $x_k$. Certainly nothing larger can possibly work. What if we start with some $x_k<x$? Then the biggest possible total that we can get is
$$\begin{align*}
\binom{x-1}k+\binom{x-2}{k-1}+\ldots+\binom{x-k}1&=\sum_{i=1}^k\binom{x-k-1+i}i\\\\
&=\sum_{i=1}^k\binom{x-k-1+i}{x-k-1}\\\\
&=\binom{x}{x-k}-\binom{x-k-1}0\\\\
&=\binom{x}k-1\\\\
&<N\;.
\end{align*}$$
So we set $x_k=x$ and let $N_1=N-\dbinom{x_k}k$. Verify that $N_1<N$. If $N_1=0$, you’re done. Otherwise, the induction hypothesis gives you a unique decomposition
$$N_1=\binom{x_{k-1}}{k-1}+\ldots+\binom{x_1}1$$
such that $0\le x_1<\ldots<x_{k-1}$. To finish, just show that $x_{k-1}$ in this decomposition is necessarily less than $x_k$; the hint that you’re given is to use the fact that $N_1<\dbinom{x_k}{k-1}$. To see why this is true, suppose on the contrary that $x_{k-1}\ge x_k$ and consider what this says about $\dbinom{x_k}k+\dbinom{x_{k-1}}{k-1}$ in view of Pascal’s identity.