0
$\begingroup$

I am trying to determine the minimal polynomial of $\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2}}$ over $\mathbb{Q}$ and explain why does it have degree $4$.

I found that the minimal polynomial is $f(x)=x^4-2x^2-1$. It is monic, and $f(\alpha)=0$. It is also irreducible as the only possible roots are $\pm 1$, however, $f(\pm 1)\ne 0$. Now, I am trying to explain why does it have degree $4$, and here is what I got:

  • The degree is not $1$ as $\alpha \notin \mathbb{Q}$.

  • The degree is not $2$ as if it was then $\alpha ^2+b \alpha +c=0$ for some $b,c \in \mathbb{Q}$. Then

$1+\sqrt{2}+(\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2}})b+c=0\implies \sqrt{2} (b^2+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2}} b)=c^2+2c-b^2-1$.

The right hand side is in $\mathbb{Q}$, but the left isn’t, which is a contradiction.

I am stuck at showing that the degree is not $3$ though. If it was three then I think that $[\mathbb{Q}(\alpha):\mathbb{Q}]=3$, and this should lead us at a contraction. I am not sure how to show that.

$\endgroup$
14
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @TymaGaidash Looks like a typo. It should be $x^4-2x^2-1$. $\endgroup$
    – C-RAM
    Nov 8, 2022 at 18:13
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @TymaGaidash sorry I meant $x^4-2x^2-1$ $\endgroup$
    – Dima
    Nov 8, 2022 at 18:15
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ "It is also irreducible as the only possible roots are $\pm 1$" - that only rules out linear factors, you need to rule out quadratic factors too (or notice $f(x+1)$ satisfies conditions of Eisenstein criterion). $\endgroup$
    – Sil
    Nov 8, 2022 at 18:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ By far the simplest way to do this: Apply Eisenstein's criterion to $f(x+1)=x^4+4x^3+4x^2-2$. $\endgroup$
    – C-RAM
    Nov 8, 2022 at 18:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You have already proved that the polynomial has no linear factor (and hence no cubic factor as well). You can also observe that if $a$ is a root of polynomial then $-a$ is also a root and hence if it has a quadratic factor then we must have the polynomial expressed as $(x^2+px+q)(x^2-px+q)$. Derive an obvious contradiction now. $\endgroup$
    – Paramanand Singh
    Nov 9, 2022 at 2:07

3 Answers 3

3
$\begingroup$

You have $\mathbb{Q} \hookrightarrow \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}) \hookrightarrow\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2}})$ : since $[\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}) : \mathbb{Q}]=2$, then $[\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2}}) : \mathbb{Q}]$ is dividible by $2$, so the minimal polynomial of $\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2}}$ cannot have degree $3$.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

If $[\mathbb{Q}(\alpha):\mathbb{Q}]=3$, then $\alpha$ would be the zero of a polynomial $p$ of degree $3$. $p$ would divide $f$. A contradiction as you proved that $f$ is irreducible over $\mathbb Q$.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ No, they didn't prove that $f$ is irreducible. The degree $2$ case needs more work. $\endgroup$
    – mr_e_man
    Nov 8, 2022 at 18:25
  • $\begingroup$ @mr_e_man The OP wrote and proved that $\alpha$ is not of degree $2$. $\endgroup$ Nov 8, 2022 at 19:36
  • $\begingroup$ Are you referring to the comments, or the original question? $\endgroup$
    – mr_e_man
    Nov 8, 2022 at 19:42
  • $\begingroup$ @mr_e_man Have you read the original question? $\endgroup$ Nov 8, 2022 at 19:48
  • $\begingroup$ The question says "The right hand side is in $\mathbb Q$, but the left isn’t, which is a contradiction." This reasoning is wrong, or incomplete. Why isn't the left side in $\mathbb Q$? $\endgroup$
    – mr_e_man
    Nov 8, 2022 at 19:52
0
$\begingroup$

This is not an answer but I always wanted to understand something :

Let $\alpha= \sqrt{1+\sqrt{2}}$ , the only way to get rid of the square root is to square ; $\alpha^2= 1+\sqrt{2}\ \ $ then $\sqrt{2}= \alpha^2 -1$ so, again squaring ; $2= (\alpha^2 -1)^2= \alpha^4- 2\alpha^2+ 1$ , meaning that $\alpha$ is a root of $$x^4-2x^2-1$$ Now here is the argument that I want you to confirm whether it is valid or not : Since we arrived to that polynomial just by 'getting rid of the square roots' in a 'minimal' way, i.e. this is the polynomial with the smallest degree we can have if we try to find a polynomial with rational coefficients. ( why? because we were just getting rid of the radicals ), and this polynomial is irreducible, then $[\mathbb{Q}(\alpha):\mathbb{Q}]= 4$ .

It seems that this argument is not quite valid because of cubics, or polynomials of degree $3$. I wonder if there is a way, a constructive way, for any root of a cubic to find immediately that polynomial, so that to make this argument valid every time?

I mean starting with $\alpha$ , and just getting rid of the radicals to arrive to the minimal polynomial, which will be of degree $3$, $4$, $5$, $6$, or more ...

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ This should possibly have been a new question, but I try and explain it anyway. The trouble is that something like the following may happen. Do the same with $\beta=\sqrt{3+2\sqrt2}$. You get $\beta^2=3+2\sqrt2$ and then $$0=(\beta^2-3)^2-8=\beta^4-6\beta^2+1.$$ But $$x^4-6x^2+1=(x^4-2x^2+1)-4x^2=(x^2-1)^2-(2x)^2$$ is the difference of two squares and hence factors as $(x^2-2x-1)(x^2+2x-1)$. I was mean and set this up. The explanation is that $$(1+\sqrt2)^2=3+2\sqrt2,$$ so we really had $\beta=\alpha^2$. Or, phrased differently, it was possible to denest the square root. $\endgroup$ Nov 10, 2022 at 18:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ More serious denesting. $\endgroup$ Nov 10, 2022 at 18:42
  • $\begingroup$ Be prepared for this to get deleted. You really shouldn't post follow up questions as answers. $\endgroup$ Nov 10, 2022 at 18:56
  • $\begingroup$ still the polynomial $x^4-2x^2-1$ is irreducible, only then I can make the conclusion. The question is how I can guarantee that there is no cubic. $\endgroup$
    – NotaChoice
    Nov 11, 2022 at 3:00
  • $\begingroup$ I am confused actually. The original question asks to explain why the minimal polynomial of $\alpha$ has degree $4$ : the person asking found that $\alpha$ is a root of $p(x)$ and that $p(x)$ is irreducible and has degree $4$. Isn't this enough as a justification? What does he want to explain exactly? $\endgroup$
    – NotaChoice
    Nov 11, 2022 at 3:30

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .