3
$\begingroup$

Let $H$ be a Hilbert space and $f:H\rightarrow H$ an endomorphism. Suppose the image and kernel of $f$ are orthogonal. Can I conclude that they are supplementary? (Namely $H = \mathop{Ker}(f) \oplus \mathop{Im}(f)$)

If $H$ is finite dimensionnal, this follows from the rank theorem. If it is not however, I am not sure how to conclude. Am I missing an assumption?

I'm not sure this is relevant, but in my specific case, $f$ has the form $f = id - r$, where $r$ is and isometry. Does the result hold with this added assumption?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Did you try looking at each element as a countable sum of the hilbert basis elements? Been a while since I've done functional analysis, but that's where my mind goes $\endgroup$
    – Alan
    Oct 11, 2022 at 20:27
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your vary fast answers. I will take some time to study them before I choose which to accept. $\endgroup$ Oct 11, 2022 at 21:28

3 Answers 3

3
$\begingroup$

The answer is negative, even in your special case. Consider $H := \ell^2(\mathbb{N})$ and $r: H \to H$ the right-shift operator, i.e., $$r(x)_1 = 0, \quad r(x)_j = x_{j-1}, \quad j = 2,\ldots.$$ Clearly $r$ is an isometry and it is well-known that the spectrum of $r$ is the unit disk. Now I claim that $f = \mathrm{id}-r$ is injective. Indeed, if $f(x) = 0$, then $$0 = f(x)_1 = x_1 - r(x)_1 = x_1.$$ Moreover, $$0 = f(x)_j = x_j - r(x)_j = x_j - x_{j-1}$$ for $j \geq 2$. This shows $x = 0$ by induction. So $f$ is injective and thus, trivially, $\mathrm{Ker}(f)$ is orthogonal to $\mathrm{Im}(f)$. On the other hand $\mathrm{Ker}(f) \oplus \mathrm{Im}(f)$ cannot be $H$ as $f$ is not invertible ($1$ is in the spectrum of $r$).

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

They are not, even if $f=id-r$ where $r$ is a surjective isometry.

Counterxample: $H=\ell^2(\mathbb Z)$, $r(u)_n:=u_{n+1}$.

Then, $\ker f=\{0\}$ (the only constant sequence in $\ell^2$ is $0$) but we shall prove that $f$ is not onto:

let $v_n=\frac1n$ if $n>0$, and $v_n=0$ if $n\le0$. Let us prove by contradiction that $v\notin\mathrm{im}f$.

If $v=f(u)$ then $\forall n>0\quad u_n=u_0-\sum_{0<k<n}\frac1k$, which contradicts $u\in\ell^2.$

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

For a counterexample, take the Hilbert space $H=\ell^2(\mathbb R)$ of square summable sequences endowed with the inner product

$$\langle x,y\rangle=\sum_\limits{i=1}^\infty x_iy_i $$ and for $f$ the left shift operator: $$f((x_1, x_2, \dots)) = (x_2, x_3, \dots)$$

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $id-f$ is not an isometry. $\endgroup$ Oct 11, 2022 at 20:38

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .