This refers to David Eisenbud's "Commutative Algebra With a View Toward Algebraic Geometry". He proves the following version of the Nullstellensatz
General Nullstellensatz [Thm 4.9 in Eisenbud] Let $R$ be a Jacobson ring. If $S$ is a finitely generated $R$-algebra, $S$ is Jacobson as well.
Before proving the theorem, he proves the following version of the Rabinowitch-trick:
Rabinowitch-trick [Lemma 4.20 in Eisenbud] Let R be a ring. The following are equivalent.
a. $R$ is Jacobson.
b. If $P$ is a prime ideal in $R$ and $S = R/P$ contains an element $b$ $\neq 0$ such that $S[b^{-1}]$ is a field, then $S$ is a field.
Hence, if $R$ is Jacobson and we want to show that so is $S$ it suffices to prove that if $P$ is a prime ideal of $S$ and $S' = S/P$ contains a non-zero $b$ such that $S'[b^{-1}]$ is a field, then $S'$ is a field. Now comes the part that confuses me. Eisenbud writes
Replacing $S$ by $S'$, and factoring out the preimage of $P$ from $R$, we may assume that $R$ is a domain contained in $S$, and that $b \in$ $S$ is such that $S[b^{-1}]$, and we must show that $S$ is a field.
I understand that $R / R\cap P$ is an integral domain since $R \cap P$ is prime in $R$ when $P$ is prime in $S$. However, I don't understand how passing to this quotient covers the initial case. Why does it suffice to consider the quotient, how does one go back to the initial case knowing that $S/P$ is a field for every prime $P \subseteq S$. Or have I misunderstood what Eisenbud means with "replacing" in this context?