0
$\begingroup$

A topological space is called a $US$-space provided that each convergent sequence has a unique limit.

A topological space is called a $KC$-space provided that every compact subset is closed.

So Hausdorff spaces imply $KC$-spaces and $KC$-spaces imply $US$-spaces.

I would like to know:

Is there an example that shows $US$-space does not imply $KC$-space?

Why is a hereditarily Lindelöf $KC$ - space $(X,\tau)$ Katetov - $KC$ if and only if there is a weaker $US$-topology $\sigma \subset \tau?

Why is $X=[0,\omega_1]$ not sequential?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ See mathoverflow.net/questions/106571/… for the first question. $\endgroup$ – dfeuer Jul 27 '13 at 19:04
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It should be obvious that Kansas City spaces are US spaces and that New York City spaces are US spaces that are not KC spaces. $\endgroup$ – Ross Millikan Jul 27 '13 at 21:48
4
$\begingroup$

A space $X$ is sequential it every sequentially closed set in $X$ is closed, where $A\subseteq X$ is sequentially closed iff $A$ contains the limit of every sequence in $A$ that converges in $X$. $X=[0,\omega_1]$ is not sequential because the subset $A=[0,\omega_1)$ is sequentially closed but not closed. It’s clearly not closed, since $\omega_1$ is a limit point of $A$. To see that $A$ is sequentially closed, let $\langle\xi_n:n\in\omega\rangle$ be a sequence in $A$ converging to some $\xi\in X$, and let $\eta=\sup_{n\in\omega}\xi_n$. Then $\eta<\omega_1$, so $(\eta,\omega_1]$ is an open nbhd of $\omega_1$ disjoint from $\{\xi_n:n\in\omega\}$, so $\omega_1\ne\xi$, and therefore $\xi\in A$.

Now let $p$ be any point not in $X$, and let $Y=X\cup\{p\}$. For each $\alpha<\omega_1$ let $(\alpha,\omega_1)\cup\{p\}$ be a basic open nbhd of $p$. In other words, $[0,\omega_1)\cup\{p\}$ is homeomorphic to $X$: to form $Y$ from $X$ I’ve simply split $\omega_1$ into two points, $\omega_1$ and $p$. You can easily check that $Y$ is compact, assuming that you know why $X$ is compact. $X$ is a compact subset of $Y$ that is not closed in $Y$, so $Y$ is not $KC$. Finally, if a sequence $\langle y_n:n\in\omega\rangle$ in $Y$ converges to $\omega_1$, it is eventually constant at $\omega_1$ (meaning that there is an $m\in\omega$ such that $y_n=\omega_1$ for all $n\ge m$), and if it converges to $p$, it is eventually constant at $p$. This implies that a sequence that converges to $\omega_1$ or to $p$ does not converge to any other point of $Y$. Finally, $Y\setminus\{\omega_1,p\}$ is Hausdorff, and sequences that converge to points of $Y\setminus\{\omega_1,p\}$ are eventually in $Y\setminus\{\omega_1,p\}$, so $Y$ is $US$.

Added: It is not true that a hereditarily Lindelöf $KC$ space is Katětov $KC$ iff it admits a weaker $US$ topology, even if weaker is understood to mean strictly weaker. Example $3.4$ of Chiara Baldovino & Camillo Constantini, ‘On some questions about $KC$ and related spaces’ is a countable $KC$ space $\langle X,\sigma\rangle$ that is not Katětov $KC$. Plainly $\langle X,\sigma\rangle$ is hereditarily Lindelöf, and it’s not hard to show that $\langle X,\sigma\rangle$ has a strictly weaker $US$ topology.

Specifically, in the notation of the paper fix any $\varphi:\Bbb N\to\Bbb N$, and replace the original fundamental system of open nbhds of $p_2$ by the smaller system $\{V_{2,\varphi,n}:n\in\Bbb N\}$. If $\sigma'$ is the resulting topology, the only sequences in $X$ that are convergent in $\sigma'$ but not in $\sigma$ are sequences that converge to $p_2$ in $\sigma'$, and they converge only to $p_2$ in $\sigma'$. Thus, $\langle X,\sigma'\rangle$ is $US$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.