3
$\begingroup$

I know that $ x \gt 0 $ because of logarithm precondition, and I can see that $ x \neq 1 $ because otherwise it would lead to $ 0^0$ which is problematic, but when I checked the graph of the function I have discovered that it started from $ 1 $ on $ x $ axis and $ (0,1) $ interval is not considered.

In sum, I thought that the domain should have been $ (0, \infty) - \{1\}$ but it seems to be $(1,\infty)$ and I can't figure out where I am wrong.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If $a<0$ then $a^b$ can also be "problematic"... $\endgroup$ Aug 28, 2022 at 18:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ the function $f(x) = a^x$ is defined if $a > 0$ then $\ln x$ must be $>0$.. $\endgroup$
    – Essaidi
    Aug 30, 2022 at 12:16
  • $\begingroup$ You cannot take real power of a négative number $\endgroup$
    – Lelouch
    Aug 30, 2022 at 12:48
  • $\begingroup$ @Lelouch: Well, you can, it just requires the use of complex numbers, and doesn't necessarily have a unique value. $\endgroup$
    – Dan
    Aug 30, 2022 at 16:01

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

First of all, we can see that $f(e^{-1}) = {(\ln e^{-1})}^{\ln^{2}e^{-1}} = -1$ so we can see that it is indeed defined for some values of $x < 1$ but $f(e^{-1/2})$ is undefined for example.

If you think about it, this question is very similar to asking for the domain of $x^x$ so this might help you. Furthermore, as @David said on his comment, if $a < 0$ then $a^b$ is "problematic". Knowing this, to avoid any problems we would want $\ln x > 0 \implies x > 1$ so we could just conveniently define $\text{dom} f(x) = (1,+\infty)$. And in this case:

$$f(x) = {(\ln x)}^{\ln^{2}x} = (e^{\ln(\ln x)})^{\ln^2 x} = e^{\ln(\ln x) \cdot \ln^2 x}$$

Now let's try to find a larger domain that includes some $x < 1$, to avoid raising numbers to an irrational exponent that is another problem on its own, let's consider all rational $\ln x < 0$, then for some $p,q \in \mathbb{N}$, $0 <x = e^{p/q} < 1$ and thus $$f(x) = f(e^{p/q}) = (p/q)^{(p/q)^2} = \sqrt[q^2]{(p/q)^{p^2}}$$ remember that $p/q < 0$ so for this expression to be properly defined we want $p$ to be even or $q$ to be odd.

So we can as well define the domain of $f(x)$ as $(1,+\infty) \cup \{\ e^{p/q} \in (0,1) \mid p = 2k \text{ or } q = 2k + 1 \text{ for some } k\in\mathbb{Z} \}$.

So its domain really depends on what you define it to be.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Consider $f(x)=x$, then write $f(x)=e^{\ln x}$. Does this imply $\text{dom} f(x)=(0,+\infty)$? $\endgroup$
    – nonstudent
    Aug 30, 2022 at 10:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @nonstudent You are right, just fixed the answer. $\endgroup$
    – ItsTrex
    Aug 30, 2022 at 12:26
1
$\begingroup$

Note: this question has only been addressed at the high school level. Therefore, the given answer does not address the question from a mathematician's point of view.


What I want to do in this answer is to find the largest interval, such that for all values ​​in this interval the function $f(x)=(\ln x)^{\ln^2 x}$ is well-defined/meaningful.

By definition we have $0<x\neq 1$.

$$\operatorname{dom}\left[(\ln x)^{\ln^2 x}\right]\longmapsto \ln x>0\vee \left\{\ln x<0\wedge \ln^2x\in\mathbb Z\right\}$$

and

$$\ln x>0\implies x>1$$

Then note that, if $\ln x<0$ then, $\ln ^2x \in\mathbb Z$.

Thus,

$$\ln x=-\sqrt n\implies x=e^{-\sqrt n},\, n\in\mathbb Z_{>0}.$$

With all this in mind, we can conclude that,

$$ \begin{aligned}&\operatorname{dom}\left[(\ln x)^{\ln^2 x}\right]\\ =&\left\{x\mid x>1\vee x=e^{-\sqrt n}, \,n\in\mathbb Z_{>0}\right\} \end{aligned} $$

If you assume $0^0=1$, then $x=1$ is included in the domain:

$$ \begin{aligned}&\operatorname{dom}\left[(\ln x)^{\ln^2 x}\right]\\ =&\left\{x\mid x\ge1\vee x=e^{-\sqrt n}, \,n\in\mathbb Z_{>0}\right\}\end{aligned} $$

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Is the first $\land$ in your first line supposed to be $\lor$? $\endgroup$
    – user170231
    Aug 30, 2022 at 17:22
  • $\begingroup$ @user170231 I confused a bit... I must use "or" instead of "and"? $\endgroup$
    – nonstudent
    Aug 30, 2022 at 17:30
  • $\begingroup$ I believe so. $$\ln x>0\wedge \left\{\ln x<0\wedge \ln^2x\in\mathbb Z\right\}$$ sounds contradictory to me - how can both $\ln(x)>0$ and $\ln(x)<0$ and $\ln^2(x)\in\Bbb Z$? I think you meant to say $$\ln x>0\vee \left\{\ln x<0\wedge \ln^2x\in\mathbb Z\right\}$$ $\endgroup$
    – user170231
    Aug 30, 2022 at 20:46
  • $\begingroup$ @user170231 Thank you for reporting this mistake. Now, I will edit the answer. $\endgroup$
    – nonstudent
    Aug 30, 2022 at 20:53

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .