In a topology textbook there was a exercise to determine the topology induced by $$x^2:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$$ where the target has the euclidean topology.

I am the opinion that $x^2$ induced a kind of "mirrored" topology, meaning the open sets are all open sets of the euclidean topology that are symmetric at $0$.

However there was the bonus-question if this topology is induced by a metric. I figured out that this topology satisfy the second axiom of countability (take $B=\{U_{1/n}(x)\mid x\in\mathbb{Q}, n\in\mathbb{N}$}, so we can take the same set like in the euclidean topology) and this ensures that this topology comes from a metric.

If there are any errors I made please correct me. However, I now wondered if it would be possible not only to show that it comes from a metric, but also to explicitly give the metric that induces the topology? I tried some stuff out by unfortunately I was not able to do this, maybe anyone of you has an idea, or maybe it is not even possible?

I would appreciate any answers on this


4 Answers 4


More stronger(generalized) result:

Let $(X, d) $ be a metric space space and $Y\subset X$.

Let us consider a map $f:X\to Y$.

Let $\tau_Y$ be the topology induced by the function $f$ i.e $\tau_Y=\{f^{-1} (U): U\in \tau_d\}$

Then $\tau_Y$ is metrizable iff $f$ is injective.

Proof: Suppose $f$ is injective.

Then define the metric $d_Y:Y\times Y\to X$ by $$d_Y(y_1, y_2) =d(f(y_1, f(y_2)) $$

Claim :(Left as an exercise)

  1. $d_Y$ is indeed a metric on $Y$.

  2. $\tau(d_Y) =\tau_Y$

Conversely : Suppose $f$ is not injective.

Then $\exists y_1\neq y_2\in Y$ such that $f(y_1) =f(y_2) $

Then $\tau_Y$ can't be Hausdorff.

For any set $U\in \tau_d$ containing $f(y_1) =f(y_2) $ contains both the points $y_1$ and $y_2$ .Hence this two distinct points $y_1, y_2$ can't be separated by two disjoint open sets. Hence $\tau_Y$ can't be Hausdorff and hence it can't be metrizable.


The topology is generated by a pseudometric $d(x,y)=|x^2-y^2|$ (which, of course, has nothing to do with the particular function or the eucldean distance on the range).


No it’s not induced by a metric. If would be so, the the space is Hausdorff, but if you take $-1$ and $1$ points, there are no disjoint open neighborhoods of them. In fact the image of $-1$ and $1$ under $x^2$ is $1$ and so neighborhoods of $-1$ and $1$ are inverse image of open neighborhoods of $1$, that contains always both $-1$ and $1$.


By your observation, neighborhoods of $1$ in this topology are symmetric about $0$ so $(-1,-1,-1,\cdots) \to 1$ in this topology. If the topology is given by a metric $d$ then we get $d(-1,1)=0$ a contradiction. Actually, this topology is not even Hausdorff!


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.