We know that if $f : [a,b] → R$ is measurable, then $f$ is “almost bounded” on $[a,b]$ in the sense that, for every $\epsilon > 0$, there is an open set $G$ with $\ell(G) < \epsilon$ such that $f$ is bounded on the closed set $[a,b]\setminus G$.


for each integer $n$, let $$E_n = \{x ∈ [a,b] : | f (x)| > n\}.$$ These sets all have finite Lebesgue measures, they form a decreasing sequence of sets and $$\bigcap_{n=1}^\infty E_n=\emptyset.$$ Consequently $\ell(E_n)\rightarrow 0$. Now just take an integer $N$ so that $\ell(E_N)<\epsilon/2$ and use $E = E_N$. Observe that $| f (x)| \le N$ for all $x \in [a,b]\setminus E$. Since $l(E) < \epsilon/2$ we can also find an open set $G\supseteq E$ for which $\ell(G) < \epsilon$ and for which the statement of the theorem must hold.

Is the contrary true? That is: are almost everywhere bounded functions measurable?


1 Answer 1


If $E$ is any non-measurable set and $f=\chi_E$ (i.e. $f(x)=1$ for $x \in E$, $0$ for $x \notin E$ ) then $f$ satisfies your hypothesis (for any open set $G$!) but $f$ is not measurable.

  • $\begingroup$ So the matter is even more radical, that is, there are even bounded functions that are not measurable. Thank you so much $\endgroup$
    – Jim Croce
    Aug 11 at 10:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.