I'd sacrifice brevity for clarity and just spell it out:
- “The two propositions' logical truth values are dependent/independent of each other.”
This dependency can be characterised like so:
- Two propositions have dependent logical truth values precisely when interpreting at least one of them as true (or as false) determines the truth value, under the same interpretation, of the other.
("Logical truth value", rather than "truth value", to indicate that the two propositions haven't been subjected to an interpretation, which determines their truth values and makes them necessarily dependent.)
Thus, $(p∧q)$ and $(p∨q)$ have dependent logical truth values, while $((p → q) → r)$ and $(p → (q ↔ r))$ have independent logical truth values.
\begin{array}{cc|c@{}c@{}ccc@{}ccc@{}ccc@{}c@{}c}
p&q&{}&(p&\land&q)&{}&(p&\land&q)\\\hline
1&1&&{}&\mathbf1&{}&\mathbf{}&{}&\mathbf1&{}\\
1&0&&{}&\mathbf0&{}&\mathbf{}&{}&\mathbf0&{}\\
0&1&&{}&\mathbf0&{}&\mathbf{}&{}&\mathbf0&{}\\
0&0&&{}&\mathbf0&{}&\mathbf{}&{}&\mathbf0&{}
\end{array}
\begin{array}{ccc|c@{}c@{}c@{}ccc@{}ccc@{}ccc@{}ccc@{}ccc@{}c@{}c@{}c}
p&q&r&{}&((p\rightarrow q)&\rightarrow&r)&{}&(p&\rightarrow&(q\leftrightarrow r))\\\hline
1&1&1&&&\mathbf1&{}&&{}&\mathbf1\\
1&1&0&&&\mathbf0&{}&&{}&\mathbf0\\
1&0&1&&&\mathbf1&{}&&{}&\mathbf0\\
1&0&0&&&\mathbf1&{}&&{}&\mathbf1\\
0&1&1&&&\mathbf1&{}&&{}&\mathbf1\\
0&1&0&&&\mathbf0&{}&&{}&\mathbf1\\
0&0&1&&&\mathbf1&{}&&{}&\mathbf1\\
0&0&0&&&\mathbf0&{}&&{}&\mathbf1
\end{array}
Trivially, each pair of non-contingent propositions has dependent logical truth values.