In a bid to understand group theory, I would like to ask the following questions:
What ways can subgroups of a group $G$ be generated (that is guaranteed to always work)? Is it (only) by the elements of $G$ (rule of $a^n$) or by the rule of subgroups generated by subsets? By the way, it does not seem like $a^n$ always work; please see the next section.
This Wikipedia section here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subgroup#Example:_Subgroups_of_Z8 mentions that the non-trivial subgroups of $G = \{0,4,2,6,1,5,3,7\}$ are $\{0,4\}$ and $\{0,4,2,6\}$. (Note that the operation here is addition modulo 8
.)
Personally, I tried using the elements of $G$ to generate subgroups. I obtained the following (alleged$_0$) subgroups by raising each element to the power $k$; where $k$ $\in \mathbb{N}_1$ :
- $H_0 = \{0\}$
- $H_4 = \{4,0\}$
- $H_2 = \{2,4,0\}$
- $H_6 = \{6,4,0\}$
- $H_1 = \{1, ..., 1\}$ # I kept on getting 1 without hitting a $0$ (the identity element)
- $H_5 = \{5,1,...,5,1\}$ # I kept on getting 5,1 without hitting a $0$ (the identity element)
- $H_3 = \{3,1,...,3,1\}$ # kept on getting 3,1 without hitting a $0$
- $H_7 = \{7,1,...,7,1\}$ # kept on getting 7,1 without hitting a $0$ .....
In my understanding, here, every $H_a$ do not qualify as nontrivial subgroups of $G$ except $H_4$; where $a$ is each element in $G$.
If using elements of $G$ (can allegedly) generate a subgroup, why am I not able to generate the subgroup $\{0,4,2,6\}$ like in the Wikipedia example?
Footnote:
$_0$. Please bear with me. I say alleged
because this is how I initially understood things, which seem to be false understanding. I am willing to unlearn and relearn.
$_1$. Natural numbers starting from 1