# Logarithmic transformation into a [0, 1] percentage interval

I've been trying to replicate a transformation of a [0, 10] inclusive interval into a [0, 1] interval. I'm motivated by the following examples (extracted from Smith et al.):

Where an input parameter ω goes through some kind of logarithmic transformation resulting in a percentage which can be used to linearly interpolate between two colors (at least this is my interpretation of the figure, if yours is different, please let me know).

Unfortunately, I don't have much information on the scale/parameters of such transformation, besides that the following [ω, y] pairs should hold true:

1. [0, 0]
2. [1, 0.5]
3. [10, 1]

I have tried to use this information to intersect a curve that goes through these points by using:

$$y = a \times log(\omega + b) + c$$

But I don't think there is a solution to this equation that satisfies the three points I mentioned earlier? At least if there is I couldn't find it...

For now I have resorted to split the input interval in two, and applying different transformations depending on whether $$\omega \le 1$$ or $$\omega > 1$$, but I would really like to find a single function $$f(\omega)$$ that works for the whole [0, 10] interval.

Any help is much appreciated!

• It looks like Henry is right about the cubic transformation here. But what you sometimes see if you want to do a logarithmic transformation and still include $0$, is choosing a cutoff value (say $0.01$) and then do a linear transformation from $0$ to the cutoff, and logarithmic on the rest. (I think for example Maple has this option for plotting). Jul 3 at 3:19

The scale used is unlikely to be a logarithm since they handle $$0$$ badly, and offsetting to avoid this rather defeats the point.

Looking at $$0.01$$ being about a tenth of the way to $$10$$ and some other points, I suspect it is more likely to be a cube root function. Since you say you want it to map $$[0,10]$$ to $$[0,1]$$ you could use $$f(x)=\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{10}}$$ and you would get the following rounded values for the tick marks shown:

0       0
0.01    0.1
0.1     0.215
0.5     0.368
1       0.464
2       0.585
5       0.794
10      1


and overlaying this on your first chart (after subtracting from $$1$$ to get the scale to go downwards and stretching to fit) shows how good a match this gives

• Damn I cant believe I forgot that cubic functions have the same "shape" as logarithmic functions... Thank you very much Henry, you are the best Jul 3 at 1:30