1
$\begingroup$

Let $s>0$ and $0 < \delta \leq \infty$. For a set $E \subset R^n$ define

$$ H_{s}^{\delta} (E)=\inf \left\{ \sum_i r_{i}^{s}\right\},$$

where the infumum is taken over all coverings of $E$ by balls $B_i$ with diameter $r_i$ no exceeding $\delta$.

Denote by $ H_{s}(E) = \displaystyle\sup_{\delta > 0} H_{s}^{\delta}(E) = \displaystyle\lim_{\delta \rightarrow 0}H_{s}^{\delta}$ the $s$ Hausdorff measure of the set $E\subset R^n$ .

I know this result : if $H_s(E) < \infty$ then $H_r (E) =0$ for $r>s$.

I am trying to prove : if $0<s<n$ and the interior of $E$ is nonempty then $H_s (E) = \infty $ .

I believe that this is the solution for my question :

if $H_s (E) < \infty$ then $H_n(E) = 0$. but this is a contradtion because :

interior of $E$ is nonempty implies $H_n (E) >0$ but I don't know how to prove this last implication..

Someone can help me ?

thanks in advance =)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Do you already know that $H_n$ is a multiple of the (Borel-)Lebesgue measure? $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer Jul 20 '13 at 22:08
  • $\begingroup$ no ... . I only know the result that I write in my question and I know the s hausdorff measure is a borel regular measure .. $\endgroup$ – math student Jul 20 '13 at 22:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Pity. If you had that, it'd be trivial. I don't remember how difficult it is to prove that, or at least, that an open $n$-box has finite nonzero $H_n$-measure, unfortunately. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer Jul 20 '13 at 22:16
  • $\begingroup$ @DanielFischer . thanks four your comentaries =) $\endgroup$ – math student Jul 20 '13 at 23:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well, you need to show $H^n(U) > 0$ for SOME nonempty open set. This is an interesting fact, and not just something from fiddling with the definitions. A good way to do it (say with $U$ the unit cube in $\mathbb R^n$) is to use knowledge about Lebesgue measure. Bound $H_n^\delta$ from below using Lebesgue measure. $\endgroup$ – GEdgar Jul 21 '13 at 12:55
1
$\begingroup$

It's inevitable that in order to prove something about measures on $\mathbb R^n$, you have to use some measure-theoretic fact about $\mathbb R^n$. What's so special about $\mathbb R^n$ that makes $H^n(U)>0$ for nonempty open $U$?

Fact. There exists a Borel measure $\lambda$ on $\mathbb R^n$ that satisfies $0<\lambda(B(x,r))\le Cr^n$ for every ball $B(x,r)$, where $C$ is a constant.

Sketch: construct $\lambda$ on $\mathbb R$ (Lebesgue measure), then take the product.

Once you have the fact, the rest is easy. For any cover of the unit ball $B(0,1)$ with $B(x_i,r_i)$ we have $$\sum r_i^n\ge C^{-1}\sum \lambda(B(x_i,r_i)) \ge C^{-1}\lambda(B(0,1))$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ where I can find a proof of the fact ? thanks for your answer =) $\endgroup$ – math student Jul 22 '13 at 1:32
  • $\begingroup$ @LeandroTavares Read anything with the words construction of lebesgue measure. $\endgroup$ – 40 votes Jul 22 '13 at 1:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.